Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Echinobase
ECB-ART-48832
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2020 Jan 01;961:114912. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114912.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Performance of distinct phenotypic methods for carbapenemase detection: The influence of culture media.

Cordeiro-Moura JR , Fehlberg LCC , Nodari CS , Matos AP , Alves VO , Cayô R , Gales AC .


???displayArticle.abstract???
We evaluated the performance of five phenotypic tests [Modified Hodge Test (MHT); combined-disk test (CDT) using phenylboronic acid, EDTA, and cloxacillin; CarbaNP and CarbAcinetoNP; Blue-Carba, Carbapenembac™ and Carbapenembac Metallo™] for carbapenemase detection in Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). A total of 73 carbapenemase producers and 27 non-carbapenemase producers were tested. All GNB were subcultured onto Müeller-Hinton agar (MHA), MacConkey agar (MAC), and sheep blood agar (SBA). High sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) was observed for MHA using CarbaNP, Blue-Carba, and Carbapenembac™. The sensitivity and specificity of CarbaNP (98.6%/100%), Blue-Carba (97.1%/91.0%), and Carbapenembac™ (100%/96.5%) were slightly lower for SBA. In contrast, unacceptable sensitivity rates of CarbaNP (71.1%) and Blue-Carba (66.6%), but not Carbapenembac™ (97.3%), were observed for MAC. The colorimetric methods showed high sensitivity and specificity to detect carbapenemase production from isolates grown on MHA or SBA. However, colonies obtained from MAC must not be tested for carbapenemase detection by colorimetric methods.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 31704067
???displayArticle.link??? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis


Genes referenced: LOC115917973