Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Ecotoxicology
2019 Jan 01;281:13-25. doi: 10.1007/s10646-018-1991-8.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
From collection to discharge: physical, chemical, and biological analyses for fish farm water quality monitoring.
de Souza JP
,
Sposito JCV
,
do Amaral Crispim B
,
da Silva FG
,
de Oliveira KMP
,
Kummrow F
,
do Nascimento VA
,
Montagner CC
,
Viana LF
,
Solórzano JCJ
,
Barufatti A
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The use of chemical substances for the management of fish farming activities may compromise the quality of the tank water itself and of water bodies that receive the effluents. As studies that assess the environmental effect caused by pisciculture are scarce, the present study aimed at evaluating the water quality in two fish farms in the region of Grande Dourados, Brazil, from the site of water collection to the site of water disposal. The tools used for this purpose were the analysis of land use and cover and the determination of physical, chemical, and biological parameters of water samples. Maps of land use and cover were created, and water samples were collected at four sampling sites in two fish farms. The Allium cepa test, assays with Astyanax lacustris, and the Salmonella/microsome assay were performed. In addition, physical and chemical parameters were measured and metal and emerging contaminants in the water samples were investigated. The A. lacustris demonstrated the genotoxicity and the Salmonella/microsome assay suggested the mutagenic potential of water samples from the fish farms and indicated higher genotoxicity in the disposal tanks than in the collection tanks of the Brilhante fish farm. However, all the samples at the Dourados fish farm were genotoxic, and mutagenicity was shown to start at the water collection site. With regard to the A. cepa test, there was no statistical difference between the collection sites in both fish farms. Moreover, the observed genetic damage may be associated with the presence of metals and emerging contaminants in the water samples, which suggests that these chemicals have potential genotoxic and mutagenic effects that are related to the type of land use and cover in the area of the region studied. Considering that contaminated waters can potentially disturb the structure and functioning of natural ecosystems, the present study demonstrated the importance of treating fish farm effluent to minimize the negative effect of this activity on water bodies.
Grossberger,
Biodegradability of pharmaceutical compounds in agricultural soils irrigated with treated wastewater.
2014, Pubmed
Grossberger,
Biodegradability of pharmaceutical compounds in agricultural soils irrigated with treated wastewater.
2014,
Pubmed
Harnisz,
The impact of a freshwater fish farm on the community of tetracycline-resistant bacteria and the structure of tetracycline resistance genes in river water.
2015,
Pubmed
Heddle,
The induction of micronuclei as a measure of genotoxicity. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.
1983,
Pubmed
Iqbal,
Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity evaluation of photo-catalytically treated petroleum refinery wastewater using an array of bioassays.
2017,
Pubmed
Iturburu,
Uptake, distribution in different tissues, and genotoxicity of imidacloprid in the freshwater fish Australoheros facetus.
2017,
Pubmed
Kado,
A simple modification of the Salmonella liquid-incubation assay. Increased sensitivity for detecting mutagens in human urine.
1983,
Pubmed
Kalantzi,
Heavy metals, trace elements and sediment geochemistry at four Mediterranean fish farms.
2013,
Pubmed
Kieling-Rubio,
Integrated Environmental Assessment of streams in the Sinos River basin in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
2015,
Pubmed
Kumar,
Investigation of the genotoxicity of malathion to freshwater teleost fish Channa punctatus (Bloch) using the micronucleus test and comet assay.
2010,
Pubmed
Lari,
Comparison of pesticide residues in surface water and ground water of agriculture intensive areas.
2014,
Pubmed
Leme,
Allium cepa test in environmental monitoring: a review on its application.
2009,
Pubmed
Machado,
A preliminary nationwide survey of the presence of emerging contaminants in drinking and source waters in Brazil.
2016,
Pubmed
Ohe,
Mutagens in surface waters: a review.
2004,
Pubmed
Petrie,
A review on emerging contaminants in wastewaters and the environment: current knowledge, understudied areas and recommendations for future monitoring.
2015,
Pubmed
Ramsdorf,
Genotoxic evaluation of different doses of inorganic lead (PbII) in Hoplias malabaricus.
2009,
Pubmed
Reifferscheid,
Cell-based genotoxicity testing : genetically modified and genetically engineered bacteria in environmental genotoxicology.
2010,
Pubmed
Schmid,
The micronucleus test.
1975,
Pubmed
Silva,
New approach on trace analysis of triclosan in personal care products, biological and environmental matrices.
2008,
Pubmed
Thomaidi,
Is there a risk for the aquatic environment due to the existence of emerging organic contaminants in treated domestic wastewater? Greece as a case-study.
2015,
Pubmed
Umbuzeiro,
In Vitro Genotoxicity Testing: Significance and Use in Environmental Monitoring.
2017,
Pubmed
Vandenberg,
Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption.
2009,
Pubmed
Yang,
Steroid hormone runoff from agricultural test plots applied with municipal biosolids.
2012,
Pubmed
Zhang,
Accumulation and cellular toxicity of aluminum in seedling of Pinus massoniana.
2014,
Pubmed
Zhou,
The chronic toxicity of bisphenol A to Caenorhabditis elegans after long-term exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations.
2016,
Pubmed
da Silva Souza,
Micronucleus test and observation of nuclear alterations in erythrocytes of Nile tilapia exposed to waters affected by refinery effluent.
2006,
Pubmed
