Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Stem Cell Res
2018 Jan 01;26:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2017.11.014.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Hematopoietic defects in response to reduced Arhgap21.
Xavier-Ferrucio J
,
Ricon L
,
Vieira K
,
Longhini AL
,
Lazarini M
,
Bigarella CL
,
Franchi G
,
Krause DS
,
Saad STO
.
???displayArticle.abstract??? Arhgap21 is a member of the Rho GTPase activating protein (RhoGAP) family, which function as negative regulators of Rho GTPases. Arhgap21 has been implicated in adhesion and migration of cancer cells. However, the role of Arhgap21 has never been investigated in hematopoietic cells. Herein, we evaluated functional aspects of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) using a haploinsufficient (Arhgap21+/-) mouse. Our results show that Arhgap21+/- mice have an increased frequency of phenotypic HSC, impaired ability to form progenitor colonies in vitro and decreased hematopoietic engraftment in vivo, along with a decrease in LSK cell frequency during serial bone marrow transplantation. Arhgap21+/- hematopoietic progenitor cells have impaired adhesion and enhanced mobilization of immature LSK and myeloid progenitors. Arhgap21+/- mice also exhibit reduced erythroid commitment and differentiation, which was recapitulated in human primary cells, in which knockdown of ARHGAP21 in CMP and MEP resulted in decreased erythroid commitment. Finally, we observed enhanced RhoC activity in the bone marrow cells of Arhgap21+/- mice, indicating that Arhgap21 functions in hematopoiesis may be at least partially mediated by RhoC inactivation.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
29212046
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC6084430 ???displayArticle.link???Stem Cell Res ???displayArticle.grants???[+]
Fig. 2. Arhgap21 deficiency in progenitor cells leads to increased mobilization and defective adhesion. (A–D) Hematopoietic cells were analyzed by flow cytometry 1 h after AMD3100 treatment. (A) Bone marrow from Arhgap21+/− mice exhibited a reduction of Gr-1+/Mac-1+ cells compared to WT (P = 0.001), whereas the frequencies of Gr-1+/Mac-1+ cells in spleen (P = 0.02) and peripheral blood (P = 0.007) were increased. (B) The change in the frequency of Gr-1+Mac-1+ cells before and after AMD3100 for each genotype is shown (after AMD3100 treatment as shown in Fig. 2A) minus before AMD3100 treatment as in Fig. 1J). (C) The frequency of LSK cells was not significantly altered in the bone marrow and spleen, whereas the frequency of LSK was increased in peripheral blood (P = 0.0005) of Arhgap21+/− mice after AMD3100 treatment (WT n = 7 and Arhgap21+/− n = 7). (D) The change in the frequency of LSK cells before and after AMD3100 for each genotype is shown ((after AMD3100 treatment as shown in Fig. 2C) minus before AMD treatment as in Fig. 1B). (E) Adhesion to fibronectin was impaired in Lin− cells obtained from Arhgap21+/− mice (WT n = 5 and Arhgap21+/− n = 5; P = 0.003). (F) Arhgap21+/− mice showed a reduction of Lin− cells expressing CD49d/CD29 (a4b1 integrin) in bone marrow (P = 0.04), but no difference in the frequency of Lin− cells expressing CD49e/CD29 (a5b1 integrin). (G) Similarly, the mean fluorescence intensity of α4β1 integrin in Lin−
Arhgap21+/− cells were also decreased (P = 0.02) when compared to WT.
Fig. 3. Impaired function of Arhgap21+/− hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo. (A-C) Short-term reconstitution was evaluated by hematopoietic recovery after 5-FU treatment. (A) We observed a higher frequency of Lin−Sca+cKit+ (LSK) cells 28 days after 5-FU treatment (P = 0.04). (B–C) Peripheral blood was collected 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment and blood cell count was performed by automated hematology analyzer. (B) There is an increase in the neutrophil number of Arhgap21 mice 14 (P = 0.0005) and 21(P = 0.0002) days after 5-FU treatment. (C) Despite an increase in the LSK frequency, there is a decrease in erythroid reconstitution 7 (P = 0.03) and 14 days (P < 0.0001) after the 5-FU treatment. (D-E) Bone marrow cells from wild type and Arhgap21+/− mice were cultured in methylcellulose media supplemented with cytokines for myeloid differentiation and the total number of colonies was scored after ten days of incubation. (D) Colonies were then replated in methylcellulose and secondary CFU formation was accessed after an additional 10 days (Primary: P = 0.007, Secondary: P = 0.02). (E) When analyzed by frequency, there is a decrease of BFU-E percentage in the haploinsufficient mice (P = 0.03), suggesting that the erythroid compartment is the most affected by the reduction of Arhgap21. (F-G) For CFU-S, bone marrow cells were injected into lethally irradiated WT mice, and spleen colonies counted after 12 days. (F) Macroscopic view of CFU-S in recipients that received cells from WT and Arhgap21+/− mice. (G) Quantification of CFU-S colonies showing reduced number of CFU-S in mice that received Arhgap21+/− cells (P = 0.002). (H–I) Serial bone marrow transplantation was performed using bone marrow cells from Arhgap21+/− and WT mice transplanted into lethally irradiated CD45.1 mice. Chimerism (CD45.2+) in the peripheral blood of the recipients was examined at indicated times after primary and secondary transplantation, showing a slight reduction of donor cells in PB of Arhgap21+/− mice, 4 weeks after primary transplant (P = 0.04). (I) Donor derived (CD45.2+) immature LSK cells, which were analyzed in bone marrow 16 weeks after primary and secondary transplantation by flow cytometry, are reduced in recipient mice that received Arhgap21+/− bone marrow in secondary transplantation (P = 0.001). Minimum of 8 WT and 8 Arhgap21+/− animals used in each experiment.
Fig. 4. ARHGAP21 knockdown impairs erythroid commitment of human CMP and MEP. (A) Real-time PCR analysis of ARHGAP21 mRNA expression of FACS-sorted CMP, MEP, MkP and ErP (from 3 different donors) show upregulation of the transcript in MkP when compared to MEP (P = 0.04) and ErP (P = 0.04). (B–C) Knockdown of ARHGAP21 in CMP and MEP cells showing decreased (B) mRNA and (C) protein expression 24 h after transduction. (D) Improved dual CFU-Mk/E assay to determine Mk/E potential of transduced MEPs. Cells are plated in a collagen-based colony assay with EPO, TPO, SCF, IL-3, and IL-6 to promote growth of megakaryocyte and erythroid colonies. After 12 days of culture, colonies are stained for CD41a (Mk specific, false colored as blue) and GlyA (E specific, false colored as red) and checked for transduction efficiency (GFP+, green). Representative images of different colony types are shown. Typical CFU-Mk/E stains for both GlyA and CD41, BFU-E stains for GlyA only and CFU-Mk stains for CD41a only. Both Dual Mk/E of MEPs (E) and methylcellulose of CMPs (F) assays show decreased BFU-E when ARHGAP21 is knocked down (P = 0.002 in Anova tests for both assays). Results are presented as average + SD from 3 independent experiments.
Fig. 5. RhoC activity is increased in Arhgap21+/− mice. (A-B) Active Rho A, RhoC and CDC42 was determined by GST-pull down assay from WT and Arhgap21+/− BM cells lysates. (A) Representative Western blots of Rhotekin-GST pull down (respective upper panel), assessment of total RhoA and RhoC (respective intermediate panels) and Actin (lowest panel). (B) Representative Western blots of PAK-GST pull down (upper panel), assessment of total CDC42 (intermediate panels) and Actin (lowest panel). (C) Quantification of western blot band intensities from GST-pull down assays normalized to the total amount of the respective RhoGTPase showing significant (P = 0.04) increase in RhoC activity.
Barcellos,
ARHGAP21 protein, a new partner of α-tubulin involved in cell-cell adhesion formation and essential for epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
2013, Pubmed
Barcellos,
ARHGAP21 protein, a new partner of α-tubulin involved in cell-cell adhesion formation and essential for epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
2013,
Pubmed
Baryawno,
Hematopoiesis: Reconciling Historic Controversies about the Niche.
2017,
Pubmed
Bassères,
ARHGAP10, a novel human gene coding for a potentially cytoskeletal Rho-GTPase activating protein.
2002,
Pubmed
Bigarella,
ARHGAP21 modulates FAK activity and impairs glioblastoma cell migration.
2009,
Pubmed
Dubois,
Golgi-localized GAP for Cdc42 functions downstream of ARF1 to control Arp2/3 complex and F-actin dynamics.
2005,
Pubmed
Florian,
Cdc42 activity regulates hematopoietic stem cell aging and rejuvenation.
2012,
Pubmed
Guan,
The role of RhoC in malignant tumor invasion, metastasis and targeted therapy.
2018,
Pubmed
Gur-Cohen,
PAR1 signaling regulates the retention and recruitment of EPCR-expressing bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells.
2015,
Pubmed
Infante,
Roles of Rho GTPases in leucocyte and leukaemia cell transendothelial migration.
2013,
Pubmed
Islam,
RhoC regulates cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by overexpressing IL-6 and phosphorylation of STAT3.
2014,
Pubmed
Klein,
Matrix metalloproteinases in stem cell mobilization.
2015,
Pubmed
Koulnis,
Identification and analysis of mouse erythroid progenitors using the CD71/TER119 flow-cytometric assay.
2011,
Pubmed
Lazarini,
ARHGAP21 is a RhoGAP for RhoA and RhoC with a role in proliferation and migration of prostate adenocarcinoma cells.
2013,
Pubmed
Liu,
Suppression of Fas-FasL coexpression by erythropoietin mediates erythroblast expansion during the erythropoietic stress response in vivo.
2006,
Pubmed
Marcucci,
Epigenetics meets genetics in acute myeloid leukemia: clinical impact of a novel seven-gene score.
2014,
Pubmed
Morrison,
The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells.
2014,
Pubmed
Mulloy,
Rho GTPases in hematopoiesis and hemopathies.
2010,
Pubmed
Méndez-Ferrer,
Bone marrow stem cells: current and emerging concepts.
2015,
Pubmed
Narla,
The road not taken?
2016,
Pubmed
Nayak,
Rho GTPases control specific cytoskeleton-dependent functions of hematopoietic stem cells.
2013,
Pubmed
Pellegrin,
Rho GTPase activation assays.
2008,
Pubmed
Pronk,
Elucidation of the phenotypic, functional, and molecular topography of a myeloerythroid progenitor cell hierarchy.
2007,
Pubmed
Ridley,
Rho GTPase signalling in cell migration.
2015,
Pubmed
Sanada,
Adult human megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors are in the CD34+CD38mid fraction.
2016,
Pubmed
Socolovsky,
Ineffective erythropoiesis in Stat5a(-/-)5b(-/-) mice due to decreased survival of early erythroblasts.
2001,
Pubmed
Spiegel,
Heparanase regulates retention and proliferation of primitive Sca-1+/c-Kit+/Lin- cells via modulation of the bone marrow microenvironment.
2008,
Pubmed
Sun,
Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis.
2014,
Pubmed
Vega,
RhoA and RhoC have distinct roles in migration and invasion by acting through different targets.
2011,
Pubmed
Wang,
Genetic deletion of Cdc42GAP reveals a role of Cdc42 in erythropoiesis and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell survival, adhesion, and engraftment.
2006,
Pubmed
Winkler,
Hematopoietic stem cell mobilizing agents G-CSF, cyclophosphamide or AMD3100 have distinct mechanisms of action on bone marrow HSC niches and bone formation.
2012,
Pubmed
Xavier-Ferrucio,
Abnormal Hedgehog pathway in myelodysplastic syndrome and its impact on patients' outcome.
2015,
Pubmed
Yang,
Rho GTPase Cdc42 coordinates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and niche interaction in the bone marrow.
2007,
Pubmed
Yang,
Rac and Cdc42 GTPases control hematopoietic stem cell shape, adhesion, migration, and mobilization.
2001,
Pubmed
Yu,
Epigenetic Memory Underlies Cell-Autonomous Heterogeneous Behavior of Hematopoietic Stem Cells.
2016,
Pubmed