Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Echinobase
ECB-ART-50301
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2022 May 23;14:141-151. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S348234.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

SMAD 3, Integrin and VEGF Expression in a Periodontal Ligament During Orthodontic Tooth Movement Induced by Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Stichopus hermanii.

Prameswari N , Brahmanta A , Sucahyo B .


???displayArticle.abstract???
Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze SMAD 3, integrin and VEGF expressions in the periodontal ligament during orthodontic tooth movement induced by hyperbaric oxygen therapy and Stichopus hermanii. Materials and Methods: Thirty Cavia cobaya were divided into 5 groups, namely, a normal control group (KN) without installation of helical springs or administration of HBOT and Stichopus hermanii gel. The negative control K(-) had helical spring without administration of HBOT and Stichopus hermanii gel for 14 days, while P1 had helical spring for 14 days then on day 3-14, Stichopus hermanii gel was added. Also, the helical spring was installed in P2 for 14 days then on day 8-14, HBOT 2.4 ATA was added 3 × 30 minutes a day, while P3 had helical spring for 14 days then on day 3-14, the gel was applied, and on day 8-14, HBOT 2.4 ATA was administered 3 × 30 minutes a day. Furthermore, SMAD3, integrin, and VEGF expressions were examined using immunohistochemical staining. Results: SMAD3, integrins, and VEGF expressions showed significant differences within the groups. The combination of HBOT and Stichopus hermanii increased the expression of SMAD3 and VEGF compared to the single administration of Stichopus hermanii. The combination treatment also decreased integrin expression compared to a single HBOT administration. Conclusion: The combination of HBOT and Stichopus hermanii increases the expression of SMAD3, integrins, and VEGF compared to control but did not show significant differences compared to single HBOT treatment.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 35645581
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC9138760
???displayArticle.link??? Clin Cosmet Investig Dent




???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???
References [+] :
Afrashtehfar, Patient and miniscrew implant factors influence the success of orthodontic miniscrew implants. 2016, Pubmed