Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Life (Basel)
2023 Jul 05;137:. doi: 10.3390/life13071510.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Blue-Green Algae as Stimulating and Attractive Feeding Substrates for a Mediterranean Commercial Sea Urchin Species, Paracentrotus lividus.
Solari P
,
Sollai G
,
Pasquini V
,
Giglioli A
,
Crnjar R
,
Addis P
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Sea urchins rely on chemical senses to localize suitable food resources, therefore representing model species for chemosensory studies. In the present study, we investigated the chemical sensitivity of the Mediterranean sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus to the blue-green alga Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, namely "Klamath", and to a few amino acids chosen from the biochemical composition of the same algae. To this end, we used the "urchinogram" method, which estimates the movement rate of the sea urchins in response to chemicals. Our results showed that Klamath represents a strong chemical stimulus for P. lividus as it elicits an overall movement of spines, pedicellariae, and tube feet coupled, in some cases, to a coordinated locomotion of the animals. Sea urchins also displayed a sensitivity, even if to a lesser extent, to leucine, threonine, arginine, and proline, thus implying that the amino acids contained in Klamath may account, at least in part, for the stimulating effects exerted by the whole algae. Additionally, our results show that Klamath, as well as spirulina, another blue-green alga with high nutritional value, is very attractive for this sea urchin species. These findings gain further importance considering the potential profit of echinoderms for commercial consumers and their growing role in aquaculture. Klamath and spirulina combine high nutritional profiles with attractive and stimulating abilities and may be considered potential valuable feed supplements in sea urchin aquaculture.
Figure 1. Representative recording of the “urchinogram”, including the sum of all visible movements of spines, pedicellariae, tube feet, and of the whole sea urchin, following supply of the seawater control (SW, CTRL) and of the Klamath microalgae at the doses 0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/mL. The movement rate was estimated by considering the changes in the mean square difference in pixel intensity between successive frames (analysis performed with the software Aviline at 5 frames/s). Arrows indicate the interval of stimulus delivery.
Figure 2. Normalized rate of movements of the sea urchins, expressed as the mean square difference in pixel intensity during a 2 min stimulation ± SE (vertical bars) after supply of the Klamath microalgae, Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, compared to seawater (SW = 100% of response, dashed line). ** and **** indicate significant differences for p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001, respectively (Dunn’s multiple comparison test subsequent to the Friedman Test). Data were obtained from 17 sea urchins.
Figure 3. Normalized rate of movements of the sea urchins, expressed as mean square difference in pixel intensity during a 2 min stimulation ± SE (vertical bars) after supply of the essential amino acids leucine (A), threonine (B), and lysine (C), compared to seawater (SW = 100% of response, dashed line). * and ** indicate significant differences for p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test after one-way ANOVA). Data were recorded from 17 sea urchins for leucine, 16 for threonine, and 15 for lysine.
Figure 4. Normalized rate of movements of the sea urchins, expressed as the mean square difference in pixel intensity during a 2 min stimulation ± SE (vertical bars) after supply of the non-essential amino acids arginine (A) and proline (B), compared to seawater (SW = 100% of response, dashed line). ** and **** indicate significant differences for p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001, respectively (Dunn’s multiple comparison test after the Friedman Test). Data were recorded from 17 sea urchins for arginine and 16 for proline.
Figure 5. Mean values ± SE (vertical bars) of the distance (A), time (B), speed (C), and tortuosity index (D) travelled by the sea urchins to find the microalgae Klamath or spirulina. Data were obtained from 16 and 17 sea urchins for Klamath and spirulina, respectively. No significant differences were found between the two treatments (p > 0.05; unpaired t-test).
Becker,
Micro-algae as a source of protein.
2007, Pubmed
Becker,
Micro-algae as a source of protein.
2007,
Pubmed
Benedetti,
Antioxidant properties of a novel phycocyanin extract from the blue-green alga Aphanizomenon flos-aquae.
2004,
Pubmed
Biolchini,
Fat storage in Drosophila suzukii is influenced by different dietary sugars in relation to their palatability.
2017,
Pubmed
Boada,
Immanent conditions determine imminent collapses: nutrient regimes define the resilience of macroalgal communities.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Burke,
A genomic view of the sea urchin nervous system.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Caicedo,
Individual mouse taste cells respond to multiple chemical stimuli.
2002,
Pubmed
Campbell,
Escape and aggregation responses of three echinoderms to conspecific stimuli.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Galasso,
Food Modulation Controls Astaxanthin Accumulation in Eggs of the Sea Urchin Arbacia lixula.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Gantar,
MICROALGAE AND CYANOBACTERIA: FOOD FOR THOUGHT(1).
2008,
Pubmed
Guidetti,
Relationships among predatory fish, sea urchins and barrens in Mediterranean rocky reefs across a latitudinal gradient.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Güroy,
Effect of dietary Ulva and Spirulina on weight loss and body composition of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), during a starvation period.
2011,
Pubmed
Gutiérrez-Salmeán,
NUTRITIONAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SPIRULINA (ARTHROSPIRA).
2015,
Pubmed
Kamio,
Finding food: how marine invertebrates use chemical cues to track and select food.
2017,
Pubmed
Machado,
Nutrition of marine mesograzers: integrating feeding behavior, nutrient intake and performance of an herbivorous amphipod.
2018,
Pubmed
Middleton,
Neuromuscular organization and aminergic modulation of contractions in the Drosophila ovary.
2006,
Pubmed
Mollo,
Taste and smell in aquatic and terrestrial environments.
2017,
Pubmed
Pusceddu,
Foraging of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) on invasive allochthonous and autochthonous algae.
2021,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Raible,
Opsins and clusters of sensory G-protein-coupled receptors in the sea urchin genome.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Schaeffer,
Risk assessment of microcystin in dietary Aphanizomenon flos-aquae.
1999,
Pubmed
Singh,
Bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria and microalgae: an overview.
2005,
Pubmed
Snyder,
Alarm Response of Diadema antillarum.
1970,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Solari,
Antennular Morphology and Contribution of Aesthetascs in the Detection of Food-related Compounds in the Shrimp Palaemon adspersus Rathke, 1837 (Decapoda: Palaemonidae).
2017,
Pubmed
Solari,
A method for selective stimulation of leg chemoreceptors in whole crustaceans.
2021,
Pubmed
Sollai,
Chemosensory basis of larval performance of Papilio hospiton on different host plants.
2017,
Pubmed
Sollai,
Taste sensitivity and divergence in host plant acceptance between adult females and larvae of Papilio hospiton.
2018,
Pubmed
Sollai,
Olfactory sensitivity to major, intermediate and trace components of sex pheromone in Ceratitis capitata is related to mating and circadian rhythm.
2018,
Pubmed
Weissburg,
The fluid dynamical context of chemosensory behavior.
2000,
Pubmed
Wells,
Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: revisiting our understanding.
2017,
Pubmed
Xue,
Extracellular polymeric substance from Aphanizomenon flos-aquae induces apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway in A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells.
2015,
Pubmed
Zhang,
Comparisons of contact chemoreception and food acceptance by larvae of polyphagous Helicoverpa armigera and oligophagous Bombyx mori.
2013,
Pubmed