Toonen RJ et al. (2011), Defining Boundaries for Ecosystem-Based Managem...

ECB-ART-50161

J Mar Biol 2011 Jan 01;2011. doi: 10.1155/2011/460173.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Defining Boundaries for Ecosystem-Based Management: A Multispecies Case Study of Marine Connectivity across the Hawaiian Archipelago.

Toonen RJ , Andrews KR , Baums IB , Bird CE , Concepcion GT , Daly-Engel TS , Eble JA , Faucci A , Gaither MR , Iacchei M , Puritz JB , Schultz JK , Skillings DJ , Timmers MA , Bowen BW .

???displayArticle.abstract???
Determining the geographic scale at which to apply ecosystem-based management (EBM) has proven to be an obstacle for many marine conservation programs. Generalizations based on geographic proximity, taxonomy, or life history characteristics provide little predictive power in determining overall patterns of connectivity, and therefore offer little in terms of delineating boundaries for marine spatial management areas. Here, we provide a case study of 27 taxonomically and ecologically diverse species (including reef fishes, marine mammals, gastropods, echinoderms, cnidarians, crustaceans, and an elasmobranch) that reveal four concordant barriers to dispersal within the Hawaiian Archipelago which are not detected in single-species exemplar studies. We contend that this multispecies approach to determine concordant patterns of connectivity is an objective and logical way in which to define the minimum number of management units and that EBM in the Hawaiian Archipelago requires at least five spatially managed regions.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 25505913
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC4260462
???displayArticle.link??? J Mar Biol
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

Figure 1. Map of the Hawaiian Archipelago with major currents denoted: the North Hawaiian Ridge Current (NHRC), the Hawaiian Lee Countercurrent (HLCC), and the Subtropical Countercurrent (SCC). The lines around the two regions of the archipelago highlight the islands, atolls, and banks protected within the PapahÄnaumokuÄkea Marine National Monument in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) and the inhabited high islands of Main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) with each of the 15 primary target areas for collection labeled. For purposes of this analysis, the islands of LÄnaâi, Maui & Molokaâi are treated as a single site within the Maui Nui complex of the MHI. Listed from northwest to southeast, these are: Kure Atoll (KÄnemilohaâi), Midway Atoll (Pihemanu), Pearl and Hermes Reef (Holoikauaua), Lisianski (PapaâÄpoho), Laysan Island (KauÅ), Maro Reef (NalukÄkala), Gardner Pinnacles (PÅ«hÄhonu), French Frigate Shoals (MokupÄpapa), Necker Island (Mokumanamana), Nihoa (Moku Manu), Niâihau, Kauaâi, Oâahu, Maui Nui, and Hawaiâi.

Figure 2. Map of the Hawaiian Archipelago with significant consensus genetic breaks among the 27 taxa listed in Table 1 overlaid as blue bars between islands. In each bar, the number of species that show evidence for restricted gene flow across the barrier is listed in the numerator, and the total number of species for which we have data across that geographic area is listed in the denominator. The total number of sites included for each species is variable because not all species have been collected or analyzed at each site. The dotted line between Maui Nui and Oâahu highlights the location of the barrier that is shared by 8 of the surveyed species but is not significantly different than random expectations. The images include some of the species included in these analyses (left to right): Panulirus penicillatus, Panulirus marginatus, Holothuria atra, Dendropoma rhyssoconcha, Monachus schauinslandi, Porites lobata, Acanthaster planci, Calcinus hazletti, Lutjanus kasmira, and Cellana sandwicensis (photo credits to Derek Smith, Joe OâMalley, and the authors).

References [+] :

Andrews, Rolling stones and stable homes: social structure, habitat diversity and population genetics of the Hawaiian spinner dolphin (Stenella longirostris). 2010, Pubmed