Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Sci Rep
2019 Jan 31;91:1027. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38228-5.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Exposure, vulnerability, and resiliency of French Polynesian coral reefs to environmental disturbances.
Vercelloni J
,
Kayal M
,
Chancerelle Y
,
Planes S
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Preserving coral reef resilience is a major challenge in the Anthropocene, yet recent studies demonstrate failures of reef recovery from disturbance, globally. The wide and vigorous outer-reef system of French Polynesia presents a rare opportunity to assess ecosystem resilience to disturbances at a large-scale equivalent to the size of Europe. In this purpose, we analysed long-term data on coral community dynamics and combine the mixed-effects regression framework with a set of functional response models to evaluate coral recovery trajectories. Analyses of 14 years data across 17 reefs allowed estimating impacts of a cyclone, bleaching event and crown-of-thorns starfish outbreak, which generated divergence and asynchrony in coral community trajectory. We evaluated reef resilience by quantifying levels of exposure, degrees of vulnerability, and descriptors of recovery of coral communities in the face of disturbances. Our results show an outstanding rate of coral recovery, with a systematic return to the pre-disturbance state within only 5 to 10 years. Differences in the impacts of disturbances among reefs and in the levels of vulnerability of coral taxa to these events resulted in diverse recovery patterns. The consistent recovery of coral communities, and convergence toward pre-disturbance community structures, reveals that the processes that regulate ecosystem recovery still prevail in French Polynesia.
Figure 1. A general theoretical disturbance-recovery model describing the resilience of complex natural ecosystems following disturbances in a limiting environment. The sigmoid recovery response encompasses (I) a linear latency phase of slow recolonization of habitats, (II) an exponential acceleration phase of increasing growth through the utilization of resources in a non-restrictive environment, and (III) a logarithmic deceleration phase of decreasing growth under escalating environmental limitations until reaching an asymptotic saturation at the carrying capacity threshold. This theoretical recovery model can be partially or fully represented mathematically by five functional models: from 1–5 representing, respectively, Linear, Exponential, Logarithmic, Logistic and Gompertz models (see equations in Methods).
Figure 2. Geographical locations of the monitored reefs. Modified from Adjeroud et al. 200542.
Figure 3. Coral dynamics (mean cover ± 95% confidence intervals) as measured on the 17 reef locations surveyed throughout French Polynesia. Letters on graphs indicate statistically different groups of cover values. Shaded areas on graphs indicate occurrences of major disturbances inducing ≥33% coral mortality: coral bleaching (▽), predator crown-of-thorns starfish outbreak (✳), cyclone (○). The general patterns of coral dynamics on each reef is synthesized using arrows: increase (↗), stagnation (↔), decrease (↘). Island names in bold are those where a disturbance-recovery cycle was observed.
Figure 4. Impacts of the three major environmental disturbances on coral communities and populations of dominant coral genera. For each coral category, box plots from left to right correspond respectively to all disturbances confounded (coloured bars with a different colour code for each group, nreef = 6), coral bleaching (▽, nreef = 3), predator crown-of-thorns starfish outbreak (✳, nreef = 2 and 4 reef locations), and cyclone (○, nreef = 1). Boxplots show the distributions of data with medians represented by the tick lines and 95% of the data delimited by the boxes and the minimum and maximum values represented by the thin lines. Letters on graph indicate statistical differences in the susceptibility of coral genera to disturbances. The average percentage of coral loss values (±SE) are also displayed as text.
Figure 5. Recovery trajectory of coral communities and populations of dominant coral genera on the three islands where a disturbance-recovery cycle was observed. Panels (A–C) illustrate recovery in population and community size as expressed by absolute cover. Panels (D–F) illustrate recovery in community structures as expressed by relative-contribution of populations to communities. Dots indicate observations (filled dots for post-bleaching recovery and hollow dots for cyclone), lines are estimated functional responses and shaded areas show the 95% confidence intervals of the regressions. Note that the panels (D–F) do not show regression intervals because they were sometimes too wide to be displayed. Asterisks indicate the pre-disturbance sizes (A–C) and relative-contributions (D–F) of the different populations and communities. The equation describing each regression is indicated on the graphs (equations 1–5, refer to the core of the manuscript for the mathematical formulae). See Supplementary Materials 2 for the estimated parameters of each equation and the associated p-values.
Figure 6. Relationships between the pre-disturbance sizes (A) and compositions (B) of communities and the estimated values of these variables when reaching saturation in coral community at the end of the recovery process. The panel C illustrates the relationship between disturbance intensity (%loss) and duration of recovery (time required to reach the pre-disturbance cover value, see Electronic Supplementary Material). Dots indicate observations (filled dots for post-bleaching recovery and hollow dots for cyclone) and lines are functional responses. The equation describing each regression is indicated on the graphs (equations 1–5, refer to the core of the manuscript for the mathematical formulae). See Electronic Supplementary Material for the estimated parameters of each equation and the associated p-values.
Adjeroud,
Recovery of coral assemblages despite acute and recurrent disturbances on a South Central Pacific reef.
2018, Pubmed
Adjeroud,
Recovery of coral assemblages despite acute and recurrent disturbances on a South Central Pacific reef.
2018,
Pubmed
Alvarez-Filip,
Shifts in coral-assemblage composition do not ensure persistence of reef functionality.
2013,
Pubmed
Barnosky,
Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere.
2012,
Pubmed
Bjørnstad,
Noisy clockwork: time series analysis of population fluctuations in animals.
2001,
Pubmed
Bruno,
Regional decline of coral cover in the Indo-Pacific: timing, extent, and subregional comparisons.
2007,
Pubmed
Butchart,
Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines.
2010,
Pubmed
Cheal,
The threat to coral reefs from more intense cyclones under climate change.
2017,
Pubmed
Cole,
Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance.
2014,
Pubmed
Connell,
Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs.
1978,
Pubmed
Darling,
Seeking resilience in marine ecosystems.
2018,
Pubmed
De'ath,
The 27-year decline of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef and its causes.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Fabricius,
Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs: review and synthesis.
2005,
Pubmed
Foden,
Identifying the world's most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals.
2013,
Pubmed
Gilmour,
Recovery of an isolated coral reef system following severe disturbance.
2013,
Pubmed
Hoegh-Guldberg,
Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification.
2007,
Pubmed
Hughes,
Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals.
2017,
Pubmed
Hughes,
Coral reefs in the Anthropocene.
2017,
Pubmed
Hughes,
Global warming transforms coral reef assemblages.
2018,
Pubmed
Hutchings,
Red flags: correlates of impaired species recovery.
2012,
Pubmed
Kayal,
Predator crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci) outbreak, mass mortality of corals, and cascading effects on reef fish and benthic communities.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Kayal,
Predicting coral community recovery using multi-species population dynamics models.
2018,
Pubmed
Lotze,
Recovery of marine animal populations and ecosystems.
2011,
Pubmed
Madin,
Mechanical vulnerability explains size-dependent mortality of reef corals.
2014,
Pubmed
Nash,
Discontinuities, cross-scale patterns, and the organization of ecosystems.
2014,
Pubmed
Ortiz,
Impaired recovery of the Great Barrier Reef under cumulative stress.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Osborne,
Disturbance and the dynamics of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef (1995-2009).
2011,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Osborne,
Delayed coral recovery in a warming ocean.
2017,
Pubmed
Selig,
Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.
2014,
Pubmed
Steffen,
The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship.
2011,
Pubmed
Tsounis,
The potential for self-seeding by the coral Pocillopora spp. in Moorea, French Polynesia.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Vercelloni,
Understanding uncertainties in non-linear population trajectories: a Bayesian semi-parametric hierarchical approach to large-scale surveys of coral cover.
2014,
Pubmed
Whitmee,
Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health.
2015,
Pubmed