Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Nat Phys
2018 Aug 01;148:848-854. doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0154-4.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Physical Forces Determining the Persistency and Centering Precision of Microtubule Asters.
Tanimoto H
,
Sallé J
,
Dodin L
,
Minc N
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
In early embryos, microtubules form star-shaped aster structures that can measure up to hundreds of micrometres, and move at high speeds to find the geometrical centre of the cell. This process, known as aster centration, is essential for the fidelity of cell division and development, but how cells succeed in moving these large structures through their crowded and fluctuating cytoplasm remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that the positional fluctuations of migrating sea urchin sperm asters are small, anisotropic, and associated with the stochasticity of dynein-dependent forces moving the aster. Using in vivo magnetic tweezers to directly measure aster forces inside cells, we derive a linear aster force-velocity relationship and provide evidence for a spring-like active mechanism stabilizing the transverse position of the asters. The large frictional coefficient and spring constant quantitatively account for the amplitude and growth characteristics of athermal positional fluctuations, demonstrating that aster mechanics ensure noise suppression to promote persistent and precise centration. These findings define generic biophysical regimes of active cytoskeletal mechanics underlying the accuracy of cell division and early embryonic development.
Fig. 2. Force-velocity relationships of microtubule asters.(a) Aggregates of injected magnetic beads were targeted to the aster center to directly apply magnetic forces to centering asters. (b-g) External magnetic forces were applied to asters either against (b-d) or along (e-g) the centering direction. The 1D kymographs (c and f) and time-evolution of aster XY positions (d and g) show how applied forces consistently change aster longitudinal speed. (h) Aster longitudinal speed Vx plotted as a function of external force amplitude. N=71 measurements from 22 cells. The red broken line indicates a linear fit.
Fig. 3. Direct demonstration of a transverse feedback stabilizing asters along their centering direction.(a and b) External forces were applied orthogonally to the centering direction along the Y-axis for 140 sec. The applied force causes a drift towards the magnet tip. (c) Aster Y saturation (shown in b) plotted as a function of external force amplitude. N=10 measurements from 10 cells. The spring constant κ=59 pN/μm was determined from the slope of the linear fit (red broken line). (d) Recovery dynamics of aster Y position. Aster Y position after force cessation was plotted as a function of time. N=10 measurements from 10 cells. Solid lines indicate best fits with exponential function (eq. S6), yielding a mean recovery timescale Ïr = 72 +/- 18 sec. Inset: Recovery timescale plotted as a function of Y saturation. The correlation analysis indicates that there is no correlation between the two variables.
Fig. 4. Aster mechanics ensure fast, persistent and precise aster centration.The large frictional coefficient of asters suppresses active fluctuations along the longitudinal axis. This process was analyzed using a simple Poisson model, in which a single dynein-force generation event causes an aster step motion (see main and supplementary text). Given this large drag, asters must exert large net endogenous forces to move at high speed in the cytoplasm. Along the transverse axis, fluctuations are further suppressed by a dynein-dependent feedback mechanism, which stabilizes the centering direction with respect to cell geometry.
Almonacid,
Active diffusion positions the nucleus in mouse oocytes.
2015, Pubmed
Almonacid,
Active diffusion positions the nucleus in mouse oocytes.
2015,
Pubmed
Barbosa,
Dynactin binding to tyrosinated microtubules promotes centrosome centration in C. elegans by enhancing dynein-mediated organelle transport.
2017,
Pubmed
Bornens,
The centrosome in cells and organisms.
2012,
Pubmed
Brangwynne,
Cytoplasmic diffusion: molecular motors mix it up.
2008,
Pubmed
De Simone,
Uncovering the balance of forces driving microtubule aster migration in C. elegans zygotes.
2018,
Pubmed
Faivre-Moskalenko,
Dynamics of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers: the role of catastrophes.
2002,
Pubmed
Fulton,
How crowded is the cytoplasm?
1982,
Pubmed
Garzon-Coral,
A force-generating machinery maintains the spindle at the cell center during mitosis.
2016,
Pubmed
Grill,
The distribution of active force generators controls mitotic spindle position.
2003,
Pubmed
Hamaguchi,
Analysis of the Role of Astral Rays in Pronuclear Migration in Sand Dollar Eggs by the Colcemid-UV Method: (sperm aster/pronuclear migration/sand dollar/colcemid-UV method).
1986,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Hamaguchi,
Microinjected Polystyrene Beads Move Along Astral Rays in Sand Dollar Eggs: (astral rays/fertilization/mitosis/microinjected polystyrene beads/sand dollar eggs).
1986,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Haupt,
How cells sense their own shape - mechanisms to probe cell geometry and their implications in cellular organization and function.
2018,
Pubmed
Hiramoto,
Mechanical properties of the protoplasm of the sea urchin egg. II. Fertilized egg.
1969,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Holy,
Assembly and positioning of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers.
1997,
Pubmed
Kimura,
Computer simulations and image processing reveal length-dependent pulling force as the primary mechanism for C. elegans male pronuclear migration.
2005,
Pubmed
Kimura,
Intracellular organelles mediate cytoplasmic pulling force for centrosome centration in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo.
2011,
Pubmed
Laan,
Cortical dynein controls microtubule dynamics to generate pulling forces that position microtubule asters.
2012,
Pubmed
Longoria,
Cargo transport by cytoplasmic Dynein can center embryonic centrosomes.
2013,
Pubmed
Minc,
Influence of cell geometry on division-plane positioning.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Mitchison,
Growth, interaction, and positioning of microtubule asters in extremely large vertebrate embryo cells.
2012,
Pubmed
Nazockdast,
Cytoplasmic flows as signatures for the mechanics of mitotic positioning.
2017,
Pubmed
Pécréaux,
The Mitotic Spindle in the One-Cell C. elegans Embryo Is Positioned with High Precision and Stability.
2016,
Pubmed
Pierre,
Generic Theoretical Models to Predict Division Patterns of Cleaving Embryos.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Shinar,
A model of cytoplasmically driven microtubule-based motion in the single-celled Caenorhabditis elegans embryo.
2011,
Pubmed
Svoboda,
Fluctuation analysis of motor protein movement and single enzyme kinetics.
1994,
Pubmed
Tang,
Centrosome positioning in vertebrate development.
2012,
Pubmed
Tanimoto,
Shape-motion relationships of centering microtubule asters.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Terasaki,
Organization of the sea urchin egg endoplasmic reticulum and its reorganization at fertilization.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Winkler,
Fluctuation Analysis of Centrosomes Reveals a Cortical Function of Kinesin-1.
2015,
Pubmed
Wühr,
How does a millimeter-sized cell find its center?
2009,
Pubmed
Wühr,
A model for cleavage plane determination in early amphibian and fish embryos.
2010,
Pubmed
Zhu,
Finding the cell center by a balance of dynein and myosin pulling and microtubule pushing: a computational study.
2010,
Pubmed