Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Front Pharmacol
2017 Nov 14;8:825. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00825.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Pharmacological Characterization of 5-Substituted 1-[(2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-2-yl)methyl]piperazines: Novel Antagonists for the Histamine H3 and H4 Receptors with Anti-inflammatory Potential.
Corrêa MF
,
Barbosa ÁJR
,
Teixeira LB
,
Duarte DA
,
Simões SC
,
Parreiras-E-Silva LT
,
Balbino AM
,
Landgraf RG
,
Bouvier M
,
Costa-Neto CM
,
Fernandes JPS
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The histamine receptors (HRs) are traditional G protein-coupled receptors of extensive therapeutic interest. Recently, H3R and H4R subtypes have been targeted in drug discovery projects for inflammation, asthma, pain, cancer, Parkinson''s, and Alzheimer''s diseases, which includes searches for dual acting H3R/H4R ligands. In the present work, nine 1-[(2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-2-yl)methyl]piperazine (LINS01 series) molecules were synthesized and evaluated as H3R and H4R ligands. Our data show that the N-allyl-substituted compound LINS01004 bears the highest affinity for H3R (pKi 6.40), while the chlorinated compound LINS01007 has moderate affinity for H4R (pKi 6.06). In addition, BRET assays to assess the functional activity of Gi1 coupling indicate that all compounds have no intrinsic activity and act as antagonists of these receptors. Drug-likeness assessment indicated these molecules are promising leads for further improvements. In vivo evaluation of compounds LINS01005 and LINS01007 in a mouse model of asthma showed a better anti-inflammatory activity of LINS01007 (3 g/kg) than the previously tested compound LINS01005. This is the first report with functional data of these compounds in HRs, and our results also show the potential of their applications as anti-inflammatory.
FIGURE 1. Characteristics considered in the design of LINS compounds 1a–i; green – aromatic core; orange – polar group; blue – additional lipophilic group.
FIGURE 2. Reaction scheme for the synthesis of LINS01 compounds.
FIGURE 3. Binding and functional characterization of the compounds in the H3R and H4R. Competition dose–response binding curves for selected compounds show that they presented lower affinity for either H3R (A) or H4R (B), as compared with histamine and selective ligands, with Ki values varying from high nanomolar to low micromolar. Functional assays in the H3R (C) reveal that all compounds do not trigger Gi activation, suggesting that they may behave as antagonists in this receptor. In the H4R (D) a similar profile was observed. Antagonistic assays show that all tested compounds when preincubated at 10,000 nM were able to fully block histamine activity in the H3R (E) and H4R (F), except for compound 1f that only partially blocked histamine activity on H4R, probably due to a weak agonistic effect in high concentrations. Data were obtained from at least three independent experiments performed in duplicate. It is also interesting to note that either on H3R or on H4R some compounds displayed a profile that suggests a mild inverse agonist activity, as can be observed by an inverse value of BRET as compared to histamine.
FIGURE 4. Possible characteristics involved in H3R binding; green – aryl or heteroaryl; orange – polar group; blue – lipophilic group; yellow – bulky group. The yellow group may define the selectivity for the H3R.
Cheng,
Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction.
1973, Pubmed
Cheng,
Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction.
1973,
Pubmed
Christopher,
A bioinformatics search for selective histamine h4 receptor antagonists through structure-based virtual screening strategies.
2012,
Pubmed
Corrêa,
1-[(2,3-Dihydro-1-benzofuran-2-yl) methyl]piperazines as novel anti-inflammatory compounds: Synthesis and evaluation on H3 R/H4 R.
2017,
Pubmed
Corrêa,
Histamine H4 receptor ligands: future applications and state of art.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Cowart,
A new class of potent non-imidazole H(3) antagonists: 2-aminoethylbenzofurans.
2004,
Pubmed
Dastmalchi,
Molecular modeling of histamine H3 receptor and QSAR studies on arylbenzofuran derived H3 antagonists.
2008,
Pubmed
Engelhardt,
Detailed structure-activity relationship of indolecarboxamides as H4 receptor ligands.
2012,
Pubmed
Fernandes,
Molecular modeling and QSAR studies of a set of indole and benzimidazole derivatives as H₄ receptor antagonists.
2011,
Pubmed
Galés,
Real-time monitoring of receptor and G-protein interactions in living cells.
2005,
Pubmed
Hopkins,
The role of ligand efficiency metrics in drug discovery.
2014,
Pubmed
Kottke,
Receptor-specific functional efficacies of alkyl imidazoles as dual histamine H3/H4 receptor ligands.
2011,
Pubmed
Leurs,
The histamine H3 receptor: from gene cloning to H3 receptor drugs.
2005,
Pubmed
Lipinski,
Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings.
2001,
Pubmed
Liu,
Cloning and pharmacological characterization of a fourth histamine receptor (H(4)) expressed in bone marrow.
2001,
Pubmed
Medina,
The role of histamine in human mammary carcinogenesis: H3 and H4 receptors as potential therapeutic targets for breast cancer treatment.
2008,
Pubmed
Neumann,
The dual H3/4R antagonist thioperamide does not fully mimic the effects of the 'standard' H4R antagonist JNJ 7777120 in experimental murine asthma.
2013,
Pubmed
Nijmeijer,
Detailed analysis of biased histamine H₄ receptor signalling by JNJ 7777120 analogues.
2013,
Pubmed
Oda,
Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel type of histamine receptor preferentially expressed in leukocytes.
2000,
Pubmed
Passani,
Histamine receptors in the CNS as targets for therapeutic intervention.
2011,
Pubmed
Reis,
Participation of transmembrane proline 82 in angiotensin II AT1 receptor signal transduction.
2007,
Pubmed
Santos,
Comparative analyses of downstream signal transduction targets modulated after activation of the AT1 receptor by two β-arrestin-biased agonists.
2015,
Pubmed
Seifert,
Paradoxical stimulatory effects of the "standard" histamine H4-receptor antagonist JNJ7777120: the H4 receptor joins the club of 7 transmembrane domain receptors exhibiting functional selectivity.
2011,
Pubmed
Shan,
Alterations in the histaminergic system in the substantia nigra and striatum of Parkinson's patients: a postmortem study.
2012,
Pubmed
Shan,
The human histaminergic system in neuropsychiatric disorders.
2015,
Pubmed
Smith,
Role of histamine H3 and H4 receptors in mechanical hyperalgesia following peripheral nerve injury.
2007,
Pubmed
Syed,
Pitolisant: First Global Approval.
2016,
Pubmed
Tiligada,
Histamine H3 and H4 receptors as novel drug targets.
2009,
Pubmed
Veber,
Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates.
2002,
Pubmed
Venable,
Preparation and biological evaluation of indole, benzimidazole, and thienopyrrole piperazine carboxamides: potent human histamine h(4) antagonists.
2005,
Pubmed
Verdonk,
Group efficiency: a guideline for hits-to-leads chemistry.
2008,
Pubmed
de Esch,
The histamine H4 receptor as a new therapeutic target for inflammation.
2005,
Pubmed
Łażewska,
Aryl-1,3,5-triazine derivatives as histamine H4 receptor ligands.
2014,
Pubmed