Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Mar Biol
2009 Jan 01;1565:1057-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00227-009-1150-0.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Waterborne cues from crabs induce thicker skeletons, smaller gonads and size-specific changes in growth rate in sea urchins.
Selden R
,
Johnson AS
,
Ellers O
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Indirect predator-induced effects on growth, morphology and reproduction have been extensively studied in marine invertebrates but usually without consideration of size-specific effects and not at all in post-metamorphic echinoids. Urchins are an unusually good system, in which, to study size effects because individuals of various ages within one species span four orders of magnitude in weight while retaining a nearly isometric morphology. We tracked growth of urchins, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (0.013-161.385 g), in the presence or absence of waterborne cues from predatory Jonah crabs, Cancer borealis. We ran experiments at ambient temperatures, once for 4 weeks during summer and again, with a second set of urchins, for 22 weeks over winter. We used a scaled, cube-root transformation of weight for measuring size more precisely and for equalizing variance across sizes. Growth rate of the smallest urchins (summer: <17 mm diameter; winter: <7 mm diameter) decreased by 40-42% in response to crab cues. In contrast, growth rate of larger urchins was unaffected in the summer and increased in response to crab scent by 7% in the winter. At the end of the 22-week experiment, additional gonadal and skeletal variables were measured. Cue-exposed urchins developed heavier, thicker skeletons and smaller gonads, but no differences in spine length or jaw size. The differences depended on urchin size, suggesting that there are size-specific shifts in gonadal and somatic investment in urchins.
Fig. 1. Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Nominal diameter change (mm) as a function of initial nominal diameter (mm) for urchins grown in the presence (black circles, solid lines) or absence (open circles, dashed lines) of waterborne cues from the crab Cancer borealis. Growth is shown for a four and b 20 weeks. Lines indicate least squares linear regressions for: i small urchins in the lag region, ii middle-sized urchins in the steadily declining region; and iii larger urchins in the tail region. For clarity, the scale is expanded for the lag region in the 20-week period. Separate lines for each treatment indicate that an ANCOVA analysis indicates that a one slope, two intercept model best fit these data; a single dot-dash line for both treatments indicates that a one slope, one intercept model best fit these data. See Table 1 for statistics
Fig. 2. Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis.a Gonad equivalent length (cm) and b gonad index (%) both as a function of final nominal diameter (mm), c gonadal AFDW equivalent length (cm) as a function of total AFDW equivalent length (cm) and d gonadal AFDW index (%) as a function of total AFDW (g) for urchins grown for 22 weeks in the presence (black circles, solid lines) or absence (open circles, dashed lines) of waterborne cues from the crab Cancer borealis. Lines in a, b, c and d indicate the fit of Eqs. 6, 8, 7 and 9, respectively, to each treatment. All lines are significantly different between treatments. See Table 2 for statistics
Fig. 3. Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis.a Skeletal ashed weight (g), b skeletal index (%), c ambital plate thickness (mm) and d aboral plate thickness (mm) each as a function of final nominal diameter (mm) for urchins grown for 22 weeks in the presence (black circles, solid lines) or absence (open circles, dashed lines) of waterborne cues from the crab Cancer borealis. For a the lines indicate least squares linear regressions on the log transformed data; for b the lines indicate fit of Eq. 10; for c and d the lines indicate least squares linear regressions. Separate lines for each treatment indicate significant differences between treatments. See Table 3 for statistics
Fig. 4. Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. a maximum spine length (mm), b mean spine length (mm), c mean demipyramid length (mm) and d demipyramid weight (g) all as a function of final nominal diameter (mm) for urchins grown for 22 weeks in the presence (black circles, solid lines) or absence (open circles, dashed lines) of waterborne cues from the crab Cancer borealis. For aâc the lines indicate least squares linear regressions on the axes variables shown; for d the line indicates the least squares linear regression fit for the cube root of demipyramid weight as the dependent variable shown transformed back to demipyramid weight. The single dot-dash line indicates no significant difference between treatments. See Table 3 for statistics
Appleton,
Water-borne stimuli released by predatory crabs and damaged prey induce more predator-resistant shells in a marine gastropod.
1988, Pubmed
Appleton,
Water-borne stimuli released by predatory crabs and damaged prey induce more predator-resistant shells in a marine gastropod.
1988,
Pubmed
Brookes,
Mechanism of a plastic phenotypic response: predator-induced shell thickening in the intertidal gastropod Littorina obtusata.
2007,
Pubmed
Crowl,
Predator-induced life-history shifts in a freshwater snail.
1990,
Pubmed
Ebert,
Longevity and lack of senescence in the red sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Edgell,
Experimental evidence for latent developmental plasticity: intertidal whelks respond to a native but not an introduced predator.
2008,
Pubmed
Ellers,
Structural Strengthening of Urchin Skeletons by Collagenous Sutural Ligaments.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Freeman,
Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations.
2006,
Pubmed
Guillou,
The effect of feeding or starvation on resource allocation to body components during the reproductive cycle of the sea urchin Sphaerechinus granularis (Lamarck).
2000,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Harvell,
The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses.
1990,
Pubmed
Hollander,
Testing the grain-size model for the evolution of phenotypic plasticity.
2008,
Pubmed
Howe,
Anthopleurine: a sea anemone alarm pheromone.
1975,
Pubmed
Johnson,
Sutural loosening and skeletal flexibility during growth: determination of drop-like shapes in sea urchins.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Strathmann,
HETEROCHRONIC DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY IN LARVAL SEA URCHINS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR EVOLUTION OF NONFEEDING LARVAE.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Trussell,
Trophic cascades in rocky shore tide pools: distinguishing lethal and nonlethal effects.
2004,
Pubmed
Trussell,
Induced defenses in response to an invading crab predator: an explanation of historical and geographic phenotypic change.
2000,
Pubmed
Trussell,
PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN AN INTERTIDAL SNAIL: THE ROLE OF A COMMON CRAB PREDATOR.
1996,
Pubmed
Vaughn,
Predators induce cloning in echinoderm larvae.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Warton,
Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry.
2006,
Pubmed