Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The nuclear envelope (NE) breaks down and reforms during each mitotic cycle. A similar process happens to the sperm NE following fertilisation. The formation of the NE in both these circumstances involves endoplasmic reticulum membranes enveloping the chromatin, but PLCγ-dependent membrane fusion events are also essential. Here we demonstrate the activation of PLCγ by a Src family kinase (SFK1) during NE assembly. We show by time-resolved FRET for the first time the direct in vivo interaction and temporal regulation of PLCγ and SFK1 in sea urchins. As a prerequisite for protein activation, there is a rapid phosphorylation of PLCγ on its Y783 residue in response to GTP in vitro. This phosphorylation is dependent upon SFK activity; thus Y783 phosphorylation and NE assembly are susceptible to SFK inhibition. Y783 phosphorylation is also observed on the surface of the male pronucleus (MPN) in vivo during NE formation. Together the corroborative in vivo and in vitro data demonstrate the phosphorylation and activation of PLCγ by SFK1 during NE assembly. We discuss the potential generality of such a mechanism.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
22848394
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC3404105 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One ???displayArticle.grants???[+]
Figure 1. PLCγ and SFK1 are co-recruited to the sperm nucleus in vivo.Unfertilised (T0) or fertilised (T+1 onwards) L. pictus eggs were fixed and stained with anti-PLCγ (green) and with anti-SFK-Cy5 (red). The spermnucleus was stained with Hoechst (blue). Arrows (white) indicate vesicles associated with the forming MPN that stain positive for both PLCγ and SFK1. Data show the confocal midsections through nuclei, and are representative of those obtained from three independent experiments. Scale bar is 5 µm (T0) or 1 µm (T+1 onwards).
Figure 2. PLCγ and SFK1 interact during the early stages of male pronuclear envelope formation in vivo.(A) Unfertilised L. pictus eggs (T0) or five minutes post-fertilisation (T+5) were fixed and labelled with anti-PLCγ-OG488 alone or together with anti-SFK1-Cy5. Samples were subjected to two-photon time domain FLIM and the lifetime of the donor chromophore (OG488) determined in the absence and presence of acceptor (Cy5). Donor (PLCγ-OG488) two-photon images, donor lifetime âheat mapsâ and Hg-lamp epifluoresence acceptor (SFK-Cy5) images are shown. At T+5 the donor lifetimes in the whole egg (middle panel) and in the vicinity of the MPN only (bottom panel) were determined. In the donor two-photon image the MPN region of interest is indicated (dashed circle). The donor lifetime heat map and corresponding two-photon image are at the same scale. The images shown are from a donor alone labelled egg. The same process was repeated with eggs labelled with donor and acceptor. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments performed. (B) The FRET efficiency for each condition was calculated. Solid green boxes are the donor alone condition, green/red stripes for donor and acceptor conditions. Data are from at least three independent experiments, with a total of 6â18 eggs analysed per condition. Boxes display the median, upper and lower quartiles and whiskers the maximum and minimum values.
Figure 3. PLCγ is transiently phosphorylated on Y783 at the NE in vivo.(A) Fertilised (T1â12) L. pictus eggs were fixed and stained with anti-pY783 on PLCγ, (green) and Hoechst (red), and imaged by confocal microscopy. Arrows (white) indicate pY783 positive vesicles recruited to the forming MPN. Data are representative of those obtained in three independent experiments. Scale bar is 20 µm (whole egg) or 1 µm (20à zoom). (B) Z-series from (A) were manipulated in Imaris (see Methods) to form a 3D reconstruction. Membrane vesicles in contact with the nucleus surface were scored (solid arrow). Those in close proximity were not (open arrow). (C) Quantification of the data in A, B. Vesicles were scored in three independent experiments. Data are expressed as mean+s.e.m.
Figure 4. Interaction of PLCγ and SFK1 on the MPN surface in
vitro declines after GTP addition.(A) Condensed demembranated sperm nuclei were fixed and labelled with anti-PLCγ or anti-SFK1 (red), Hoechst (blue) and DiOC6 (green). Nuclei were imaged by confocal microscopy. (B) Demembranated sperm nuclei were decondensed in fertilised egg cytoplasmic extract and ATP-GS. Nuclei were treated with 1 mM GTP as indicated (minutes), fixed and labelled with anti-PLCγ (green) and anti-SFK1 (red) directly conjugated to OG488 and Cy5 respectively. Arrows denote PLCγ and SFK1 co-localisation. All images are representative of those obtained in three independent experiments. Scale bar is 1 µm. (C) Decondensed nuclei were prepared as in B, and labelled with anti-PLCγ and anti-SFK directly conjugated to OG488 (green, donor) and Alexa 546 (red, acceptor) respectively. The Ïp and Ïm of the donor chromophore were determined for each condition by frequency domain FLIM in the absence (green) and presence (green and red bars) of acceptor and used to calculate the FRET efficiency. 10â18 nuclei were analysed for each condition. Boxes display the median, upper and lower quartiles and whiskers the maximum and minimum values.
Figure 5. PLCγ is transiently phosphorylated on Y783 at the NE in vitro.Demembranated sperm nuclei were fixed alone (top row) or decondensed in fertilised egg cytoplasmic extract and ATP-GS (lower panels). Nuclei were additionally treated with 1 mM GTP for the times indicated (minutes) and were fixed and stained with Hoechst (blue), DiOC6 (green) and anti-pY783 of PLCγ (red). Nuclei were imaged by confocal microscopy. Note the staining of the NERs with anti-pY783 is retained in nuclei decondensed in ATP-GS (2nd row). Data are representative of those obtained in three independent experiments. Scale bar is 1 µm.
Figure 6. PLCγ Y783 phosphorylation requires SFK catalytic activity and GTP hydrolysis.(A) Experiment was performed as in Figure. 5 with nuclei treated for 5 minutes with 1 mM GTP or 2 mM GTPγS. Nuclei were also pre-incubated with the Src inhibitor PP2 or its inactive analogue PP3 (both 10 µM). After this time nuclei were fixed and stained with Hoechst (blue), DiOC6 (green) and anti-pY783 (red), and imaged by confocal microscopy. (B) Nuclei in A were scored for multiple pY783-positive sites on the nucleus surface. Data are expressed as mean+s.e.m from three independent experiments. Scale bar is 1 µm. (C) Experiments performed as in (B) with NE proteins subjected to an anti-pY783 western blot. pY783 bands were normalised to total PLCγ and expressed as a fold-change compared to nuclei assembled in the presence of ATP only. Data are expressed as mean+s.e.m from at least three independent experiments.
Figure 7. NE formation in vitro is dependent upon SFK kinase activity.(A) Experiments were performed as in Figure 6 with incubation of 1 mM GTP for 2 hours. After this time nuclear membranes were stained with DiOC6, and the nuclei scored as having bound vesicles (punctate signal) or a complete NE (continuous rim). Epifluoresence images and quantification (mean+s.e.m) are for three independent experiments. (B) Experiment performed as in A with GTP replaced with either normal IgY or anti-SFK1 serum (both at 1 µg/ml). Nuclei were scored as above. Scale bar is 5 µm.
Figure 8. Schematic model and data summary of molecular events leading to NE formation.Once the sperm has entered the egg in vivo, or upon the sperm nucleus mixing with egg cytoplasmic extract and ATP-GS in vitro, the sperm nucleus decondenses (not shown), with concomitant membrane vesicle binding to the nucleus surface (grey). Left: MV1 vesicles enriched in SFK1, PLCγ and PtdIns(4,5)P2 bind in a polar fashion near the two sperm NERs. SFK1 and PLCγ directly interact. The premature phosphorylation of PLCγ by SFK1 is prevented by Csk inhibition of SFK1. Middle: Upon addition of GTP, Csk inhibition of SFK1 is removed, and SFK1 phosphorylates PLCγ on its Y783 residue, a pre-requisite for full PLCγ activation. Once active, PLCγ hydrolyses PtdIns(4,5)P2 to the fusogenic lipid DAG, which initially promotes membrane fusion events between MV1 vesicles and possibly NERs. Right: Fusion events subsequently spread over the surface of the sperm nucleus [19] until it is enclosed by a continuous double bilayer perforated with nuclear pore complexes (not shown). After fusion is initiated, PLCγ and SFK1 dissociate but remain on the NE. L and C denote the luminal and cytoplasmic faces of vesicles respectively. ER denotes endoplasmic reticulum derived membranes.
Alcor,
Revealing signaling in single cells by single- and two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.
2009, Pubmed
Alcor,
Revealing signaling in single cells by single- and two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.
2009,
Pubmed
Anderson,
Nuclear envelope formation by chromatin-mediated reorganization of the endoplasmic reticulum.
2007,
Pubmed
Antonin,
Nuclear pore complex assembly through the cell cycle: regulation and membrane organization.
2008,
Pubmed
Arkinstall,
Activation of phospholipase C gamma in Schizosaccharomyces pombe by coexpression of receptor or nonreceptor tyrosine kinases.
1995,
Pubmed
Barona,
Diacylglycerol induces fusion of nuclear envelope membrane precursor vesicles.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Baur,
NSF- and SNARE-mediated membrane fusion is required for nuclear envelope formation and completion of nuclear pore complex assembly in Xenopus laevis egg extracts.
2007,
Pubmed
Boggon,
Structure and regulation of Src family kinases.
2004,
Pubmed
Bradham,
The sea urchin kinome: a first look.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Byrne,
Nuclear envelope assembly is promoted by phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C with selective recruitment of phosphatidylinositol-enriched membranes.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Byrne,
PLCgamma is enriched on poly-phosphoinositide-rich vesicles to control nuclear envelope assembly.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Byrne,
Tyrosine kinase regulation of nuclear envelope assembly.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Byrne,
Nuclear envelope formation in vitro: a sea urchin egg cell-free system.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Calleja,
Intramolecular and intermolecular interactions of protein kinase B define its activation in vivo.
2007,
Pubmed
Cameron,
In vitro development of the sea urchin male pronucleus.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Collas,
Formation of the sea urchin male pronucleus in vitro: membrane-independent chromatin decondensation and nuclear envelope-dependent nuclear swelling.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Collas,
Targeting of membranes to sea urchin sperm chromatin is mediated by a lamin B receptor-like integral membrane protein.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Collas,
Lipophilic organizing structures of sperm nuclei target membrane vesicle binding and are incorporated into the nuclear envelope.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Collas,
Conserved binding recognition elements of sperm chromatin, sperm lipophilic structures and nuclear envelope precursor vesicles.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Collas,
Distinct egg membrane vesicles differing in binding and fusion properties contribute to sea urchin male pronuclear envelopes formed in vitro.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Conner,
A rab3 homolog in sea urchin functions in cell division.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Conner,
rab3 mediates cortical granule exocytosis in the sea urchin egg.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Cooper,
Dephosphorylation or antibody binding to the carboxy terminus stimulates pp60c-src.
1986,
Pubmed
Dumas,
Spatial regulation of membrane fusion controlled by modification of phosphoinositides.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Foltz,
Echinoderm eggs and embryos: procurement and culture.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Garnier-Lhomme,
Nuclear envelope remnants: fluid membranes enriched in sterols and polyphosphoinositides.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Giusti,
Function of a sea urchin egg Src family kinase in initiating Ca2+ release at fertilization.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Gould,
New roles for endosomes: from vesicular carriers to multi-purpose platforms.
2009,
Pubmed
Gresset,
Mechanism of phosphorylation-induced activation of phospholipase C-gamma isozymes.
2010,
Pubmed
Hetzer,
GTP hydrolysis by Ran is required for nuclear envelope assembly.
2000,
Pubmed
Imschenetzky,
Chromatin remodeling during sea urchin early development: molecular determinants for pronuclei formation and transcriptional activation.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Jaffe,
Quantitative microinjection of oocytes, eggs, and embryos.
2004,
Pubmed
Khare,
1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 stimulates phospholipase C-gamma in rat colonocytes: role of c-Src in PLC-gamma activation.
1997,
Pubmed
Kim,
PDGF stimulation of inositol phospholipid hydrolysis requires PLC-gamma 1 phosphorylation on tyrosine residues 783 and 1254.
1991,
Pubmed
Larijani,
Role for phosphatidylinositol in nuclear envelope formation.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Larijani,
Nuclear envelope formation: mind the gaps.
2009,
Pubmed
Liao,
In vitro tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma 1 and PLC-gamma 2 by src-family protein tyrosine kinases.
1993,
Pubmed
Longo,
Morphological features of the surface of the sea urchin (Arbacia punctulata) egg: oolemma-cortical granule association.
1981,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Longo,
The fine structure of pronuclear development and fusion in the sea urchin, Arbacia punctulata.
1968,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Longo,
Fertilization: a comparative ultrastructural review.
1973,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Longo,
Derivation of the membrane comprising the male pronuclear envelope in inseminated sea urchin eggs.
1976,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Luttrell,
Not so strange bedfellows: G-protein-coupled receptors and Src family kinases.
2004,
Pubmed
Ma,
Src tyrosine kinase is a novel direct effector of G proteins.
2000,
Pubmed
Okada,
CSK: a protein-tyrosine kinase involved in regulation of src family kinases.
1991,
Pubmed
O'Neill,
Distinct roles for multiple Src family kinases at fertilization.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Poccia,
Transforming sperm nuclei into male pronuclei in vivo and in vitro.
1996,
Pubmed
Poccia,
Packaging and unpackaging the sea urchin sperm genome.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Poccia,
Nuclear envelope dynamics during male pronuclear development.
1997,
Pubmed
Poulin,
Intramolecular interaction between phosphorylated tyrosine-783 and the C-terminal Src homology 2 domain activates phospholipase C-gamma1.
2005,
Pubmed
Runft,
Identification of a starfish egg PLC-gamma that regulates Ca2+ release at fertilization.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Sharma,
Fertilization triggers localized activation of Src-family protein kinases in the zebrafish egg.
2006,
Pubmed
Stenmark,
Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic.
2009,
Pubmed
Stricker,
Roles of Src family kinase signaling during fertilization and the first cell cycle in the marine protostome worm Cerebratulus.
2010,
Pubmed
Townley,
Signal transduction at fertilization: the Ca2+ release pathway in echinoderms and other invertebrate deuterostomes.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Townley,
Expression of multiple Src family kinases in sea urchin eggs and their function in Ca2+ release at fertilization.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Voronina,
betagamma subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins contribute to Ca2+ release at fertilization in the sea urchin.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Wilson,
THE SEX-CHROMOSOMES OF SEA-URCHINS.
1925,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase