Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Echinobase
ECB-ART-39555
Z Naturforsch C J Biosci 2005 Jan 01;607-8:539-43. doi: 10.1515/znc-2005-7-805.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Antiproliferative effects of two amides, piperine and piplartine, from Piper species.

Bezerra DP , Pessoa C , de Moraes MO , Silveira ER , Lima MA , Elmiro FJ , Costa-Lotufo LV .


???displayArticle.abstract???
The present work evaluated the cytotoxicity of piplartine {5,6-dihydro-1-[1-oxo-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-trans-2-propenyl]-2(1H)pyridinone} and piperine {1-[5-(1,3)-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-oxo-2,4-pentadienyl]piperidine}, components obtained from Piper species. The substances were tested for their cytotoxicity on the brine shrimp lethality assay, sea urchin eggs development, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay using tumor cell lines and lytic activity on mouse erythrocytes. Piperine showed higher toxicity in brine shrimp (DL50 = 2.8 +/- 0.3 microg/ml) than piplartine (DL50 = 32.3 +/- 3.4 microg/ml). Both piplartine and piperine inhibited the sea urchin eggs development during all phases examined, first and third cleavage and blastulae, but in this assay piplartine was more potent than piperine. In the MTT assay, piplartine was the most active with IC50 values in the range of 0.7 to 1.7 microg/ml. None of the tested substances induced hemolysis of mouse erythrocytes, suggesting that the cytotoxicity of piplartine and piperine was not related to membrane damage.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 16163826
???displayArticle.link??? Z Naturforsch C J Biosci


Genes referenced: LOC100887844 LOC100893907 LOC115919910