Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Development of an Fe3O4@Cu silicate based sensing platform for the electrochemical sensing of dopamine.
Das AK
,
Kuchi R
,
Van PC
,
Sohn Y
,
Jeong JR
.
Abstract
Abnormal levels of dopamine (DA) in body fluids is an indication of serious health issues, hence development of highly sensitive platforms for the precise detection of DA is highly essential. Herein, we demonstrate an Fe3O4@Cu silicate based electrochemical sensing platform for the detection of DA. Morphology and BET analysis shows the formation of ∼320 nm sized sea urchin-like Fe3O4@Cu silicate core-shell nanostructures with a 174.5 m2 g-1 surface area. Compared to Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2, the Fe3O4@Cu silicate urchins delivered enhanced performance towards the electrochemical sensing of DA in neutral pH. The Fe3O4@Cu silicate sensor has a 1.37 μA μM-1 cm-2 sensitivity, 100-700 μM linear range and 3.2 μM limit of detection (LOD). In addition, the proposed Fe3O4@Cu silicate DA sensor also has good stability, selectivity, reproducibility and repeatability. The presence of Cu in Fe3O4@Cu silicate and the negatively charged surface of the Cu silicate shell play a vital role in achieving high selectivity and sensitivity during DA sensing. The current investigation not only represents the development of a highly selective DA sensor but also directs towards the possibility for the fabrication of other Cu silicate based core-shell nanostructures for the precise detection of DA.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchins.
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of Fe3O4 nanospheres (a), Fe3O4@SiO2 nanospheres (b), and Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchins (c).
Fig. 2. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of Fe3O4 (a), Fe3O4/SiO2 (b), and Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchins (c). Inset shows the corresponding pore width distribution.
Fig. 3. SEM images of Fe3O4 nanospheres (a), Fe3O4@SiO2 nanospheres (b), and Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchins (c and d).
Fig. 4. SEM image (a), EDS profile of Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchins (b) and corresponding elemental mapping of Fe, Cu, O and Si (c–f).
Fig. 5. TEM images of Fe3O4 nanospheres (a), Fe3O4@SiO2 nanospheres (b), and Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchins (c and d). HRTEM image (e) and SAED pattern taken from the shell of the Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell structure (f).
Fig. 6. (A) Cyclic voltammograms of (a) CP, (b) CP-Fe3O4, (c) CP-Fe3O4@SiO2 and (d) CP-Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchins in 0.1 M KCl containing 1 mM Fe(CN)64− at 50 mV s−1 scan rate and (B) Nyquist plot.
Fig. 7. Cyclic voltammograms of (a) CP, (b) CP-Fe3O4, (c) CP-Fe3O4@SiO2 and (d) CP-Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchins electrodes in 0.1 M PBS containing 1.8 mM DA at 50 mV s−1 scan rate.
Fig. 8. (A) Cyclic voltammograms obtained on CP-Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchin electrode in 0.1 M PBS containing 1.8 mM DA at different scan rates (10–100 mV s−1) and (B) plot of anodic and cathodic peak currents vs. square root of scan rate.
Fig. 9. (a) Cyclic voltammograms obtained for the different concentration of DA (0.2–1.8 mM) on CP-Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchin electrode in 0.1 M PBS at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 and (b) corresponding calibration plot.
Fig. 10. (a) Cyclic voltammograms obtained on CP-Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchin electrode at 50 mV s−1 scan rate in 0.1 M PBS of different pH (3–8) containing 1.8 mM DA. (b) Calibration plot for pH vs. oxidation potential.
Fig. 11. (a) Voltammetric response of CP-Fe3O4@Cu silicate core–shell urchin electrode in 0.1 M PBS containing 1.8 mM DA at 50 mV s−1 scan rate after 1st, 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th and 50th cycles. (b) Plot of catalytic current vs. cycle number.
Al Abass,
The unexpected activity of Pd nanoparticles prepared using a non-ionic surfactant template.
2014, Pubmed
Al Abass,
The unexpected activity of Pd nanoparticles prepared using a non-ionic surfactant template.
2014,
Pubmed
Arvand,
Magnetic core-shell Fe₃O₄@SiO₂/MWCNT nanocomposite modified carbon paste electrode for amplified electrochemical sensing of uric acid.
2014,
Pubmed
Diaz-Diestra,
L-cysteine capped ZnS:Mn quantum dots for room-temperature detection of dopamine with high sensitivity and selectivity.
2017,
Pubmed
Fernandes,
Novel electrochemical sensor based on N-doped carbon nanotubes and Fe3O4 nanoparticles: simultaneous voltammetric determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid.
2014,
Pubmed
Grace,
Dopamine system dysregulation by the hippocampus: implications for the pathophysiology and treatment of schizophrenia.
2012,
Pubmed
Gupta,
Recent advances on potentiometric membrane sensors for pharmaceutical analysis.
2011,
Pubmed
Gupta,
A reversible fluorescence "off-on-off" sensor for sequential detection of aluminum and acetate/fluoride ions.
2015,
Pubmed
Gupta,
Electrochemical Analysis of Some Toxic Metals by Ion-Selective Electrodes.
2011,
Pubmed
Hsu,
Gold nanostructures on flexible substrates as electrochemical dopamine sensors.
2012,
Pubmed
Kim,
Silica stationary phase-based on-line sample enrichment coupled with LC-MS/MS for the quantification of dopamine, serotonin and their metabolites in rat brain microdialysates.
2016,
Pubmed
Kim,
Electrochemical detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid using graphene modified electrodes.
2010,
Pubmed
Ku,
Highly selective dopamine electrochemical sensor based on electrochemically pretreated graphite and nafion composite modified screen printed carbon electrode.
2013,
Pubmed
Liu,
A novel label-free electrochemical aptasensor based on graphene-polyaniline composite film for dopamine determination.
2012,
Pubmed
Liu,
Synthesis and microwave absorption properties of yolk-shell microspheres with magnetic iron oxide cores and hierarchical copper silicate shells.
2013,
Pubmed
Matos,
Electrochemical determination of dopamine based on self-assembled peptide nanostructure.
2011,
Pubmed
Peik-See,
Simultaneous electrochemical detection of dopamine and ascorbic acid using an iron oxide/reduced graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode.
2014,
Pubmed
Qian,
In situ polymerization of highly dispersed polypyrrole on reduced graphite oxide for dopamine detection.
2013,
Pubmed
Reyes,
Trophic factors differentiate dopamine neurons vulnerable to Parkinson's disease.
2013,
Pubmed
Rooney,
Achievement of near-reversible behavior for the.
2000,
Pubmed
Salamon,
One-pot synthesis of magnetite nanorods/graphene composites and its catalytic activity toward electrochemical detection of dopamine.
2015,
Pubmed
Srivastava,
PVC-Based 2,2,2-Cryptand Sensor for Zinc Ions.
1996,
Pubmed
Teymourian,
Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles/reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as a novel electrochemical and bioeletrochemical sensing platform.
2013,
Pubmed
Wen,
Simple and Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of Dopamine Based on Assembly of Cyclodextrin-Modified Au Nanoparticles.
2016,
Pubmed
Zhao,
Carbon nanotube nanoweb-bioelectrode for highly selective dopamine sensing.
2012,
Pubmed