Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Natl Sci Rev
2019 Oct 01;65:993-1003. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz064.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Evolutionary transition between invertebrates and vertebrates via methylation reprogramming in embryogenesis.
Xu X
,
Li G
,
Li C
,
Zhang J
,
Wang Q
,
Simmons DK
,
Chen X
,
Wijesena N
,
Zhu W
,
Wang Z
,
Wang Z
,
Ju B
,
Ci W
,
Lu X
,
Yu D
,
Wang QF
,
Aluru N
,
Oliveri P
,
Zhang YE
,
Martindale MQ
,
Liu J
.
Abstract
Major evolutionary transitions are enigmas, and the most notable enigma is between invertebrates and vertebrates, with numerous spectacular innovations. To search for the molecular connections involved, we asked whether global epigenetic changes may offer a clue by surveying the inheritance and reprogramming of parental DNA methylation across metazoans. We focused on gametes and early embryos, where the methylomes are known to evolve divergently between fish and mammals. Here, we find that methylome reprogramming during embryogenesis occurs neither in pre-bilaterians such as cnidarians nor in protostomes such as insects, but clearly presents in deuterostomes such as echinoderms and invertebrate chordates, and then becomes more evident in vertebrates. Functional association analysis suggests that DNA methylation reprogramming is associated with development, reproduction and adaptive immunity for vertebrates, but not for invertebrates. Interestingly, the single HOX cluster of invertebrates maintains unmethylated status in all stages examined. In contrast, the multiple HOX clusters show dramatic dynamics of DNA methylation during vertebrate embryogenesis. Notably, the methylation dynamics of HOX clusters are associated with their spatiotemporal expression in mammals. Our study reveals that DNA methylation reprogramming has evolved dramatically during animal evolution, especially after the evolutionary transitions from invertebrates to vertebrates, and then to mammals.
Figure 1. Conservation and divergence of global methylation patterns in animals. (a) Evolutionary tree of animal species used in this study. (b) Global average methylation levels across different animals. Cluster under bars represents evolutionary tree of animals which is derived from the Time Tree (http://timetree.org/). (c) Genomic snapshots (IGV) displaying mosaic methylation pattern in invertebrates. âWâ means worker bee. âDâ means drone bee. âblaâ means blastoderm. âgasâ represents âgastrulaâ. Vertical line height indicates the methylation level (ML). (d) Variation of methylation levels across 6 kb upstream and downstream of transcription start sites (TSSs) in sperm (methylation levels were calculated for every 100-bp bin).
Figure 2. Evolution of methylation dynamic during early embryogenesis in animals. (a)â(d) The dynamics of the average methylation levels in sea anemone (a), honey bee (b), sea urchin (c) and sea squirt (d). (e) Graphic model of DNA methylation dynamics during zebrafish early embryogenesis from previous data. âMBTâ means midblastula transition. (f) Graphic model of the DNA methylation dynamics during mammalian early embryogenesis from previous data. âE7.5â means mouse embryos 7.5 days after fertilization. â6-weekâ means human embryos 6-weeks after fertilization. (g) Methylation level differences between sperm and oocytes for seven species. Tree topology is from the Time Tree (http://timetree.org/).
Figure 3. Evolution of promoter reprogramming in animals. (a) Heatmaps of differentially methylated promoters between sperm and oocytes across different species. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment of genes with differentially methylated promoters was performed. The color key from blue to pink indicates the DNA methylation levels (MLs) from low to high, respectively. (b) Genomic snapshot shows reprogramming of promoters in sea urchin and human. Red boxes highlight the promoter regions.
Figure 4. Methylation of the HOX gene clusters in different taxa. (a)â(d) Genomic snapshots representing methylation of the HOX gene clusters in sperm, oocytes and early embryos of sea anemone (a), honey bee workers and drones (b), sea urchin (c) and sea squirt (d). Oblique lines represent regions of the HOX cluster that are non-contiguous or interrupted. (e)â(g) Genomic snapshots show methylation dynamics of HOX gene clusters in zebrafish (e), mouse (f) and human (g). (h) Boxplots show the promoter methylation levels (MLs) of HOX genes between 6-week embryos and placenta in human. P value was calculated by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ***P < 0.001. (i) Normalized expression levels of HOXD genes in human 6-week embryos and placenta. FPKM stands for fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads.
Bainbridge,
The evolution of pregnancy.
2014, Pubmed
Bainbridge,
The evolution of pregnancy.
2014,
Pubmed
Banerjee-Basu,
Molecular evolution of the homeodomain family of transcription factors.
2001,
Pubmed
BIG Data Center Members,
Database Resources of the BIG Data Center in 2018.
2018,
Pubmed
Bird,
DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory.
2002,
Pubmed
Bonasio,
Genome-wide and caste-specific DNA methylomes of the ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator.
2012,
Pubmed
Borgel,
Targets and dynamics of promoter DNA methylation during early mouse development.
2010,
Pubmed
Burke,
Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology.
1995,
Pubmed
Carroll,
Endless forms: the evolution of gene regulation and morphological diversity.
2000,
Pubmed
Chen,
New genes as drivers of phenotypic evolution.
2013,
Pubmed
Dabe,
DNA Methylation in Basal Metazoans: Insights from Ctenophores.
2015,
Pubmed
Drewell,
The dynamic DNA methylation cycle from egg to sperm in the honey bee Apis mellifera.
2014,
Pubmed
Feng,
Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals.
2010,
Pubmed
Finnerty,
Origins of bilateral symmetry: Hox and dpp expression in a sea anemone.
2004,
Pubmed
Flajnik,
Origin and evolution of the adaptive immune system: genetic events and selective pressures.
2010,
Pubmed
Garcia-Fernández,
Archetypal organization of the amphioxus Hox gene cluster.
1994,
Pubmed
Gatzmann,
The methylome of the marbled crayfish links gene body methylation to stable expression of poorly accessible genes.
2018,
Pubmed
Guo,
The DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos.
2014,
Pubmed
Hackett,
Beyond DNA: programming and inheritance of parental methylomes.
2013,
Pubmed
Hon,
Epigenetic memory at embryonic enhancers identified in DNA methylation maps from adult mouse tissues.
2013,
Pubmed
Jiang,
Sperm, but not oocyte, DNA methylome is inherited by zebrafish early embryos.
2013,
Pubmed
Jones,
Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond.
2012,
Pubmed
Kimmel,
Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish.
1995,
Pubmed
Kobayashi,
Contribution of intragenic DNA methylation in mouse gametic DNA methylomes to establish oocyte-specific heritable marks.
2012,
Pubmed
Lemons,
Genomic evolution of Hox gene clusters.
2006,
Pubmed
Li,
DNA methylation reprogramming of functional elements during mammalian embryonic development.
2018,
Pubmed
Lister,
Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences.
2009,
Pubmed
Lister,
Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development.
2013,
Pubmed
Ludwig,
Mouse mutants lacking the type 2 IGF receptor (IGF2R) are rescued from perinatal lethality in Igf2 and Igf1r null backgrounds.
1996,
Pubmed
Mugal,
Evolutionary consequences of DNA methylation on the GC content in vertebrate genomes.
2015,
Pubmed
Okae,
Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation dynamics during early human development.
2014,
Pubmed
Pascual-Anaya,
Evolution of Hox gene clusters in deuterostomes.
2013,
Pubmed
Pires-daSilva,
The evolution of signalling pathways in animal development.
2003,
Pubmed
Potok,
Reprogramming the maternal zebrafish genome after fertilization to match the paternal methylation pattern.
2013,
Pubmed
Reik,
Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome.
2001,
Pubmed
Schübeler,
Function and information content of DNA methylation.
2015,
Pubmed
Schultz,
Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation.
2015,
Pubmed
Smith,
DNA methylation dynamics of the human preimplantation embryo.
2014,
Pubmed
Smith,
A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo.
2012,
Pubmed
Song,
Genome-wide DNA methylomes from discrete developmental stages reveal the predominance of non-CpG methylation in Tribolium castaneum.
2017,
Pubmed
Soshnikova,
Duplications of hox gene clusters and the emergence of vertebrates.
2013,
Pubmed
Surani,
Genome imprinting and development in the mouse.
1990,
Pubmed
Suzuki,
DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics.
2008,
Pubmed
Tomizawa,
DNA methylation establishment during oocyte growth: mechanisms and significance.
2012,
Pubmed
Wang,
Function and evolution of DNA methylation in Nasonia vitripennis.
2013,
Pubmed
Wang,
Genome-wide and single-base resolution DNA methylomes of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas provide insight into the evolution of invertebrate CpG methylation.
2014,
Pubmed
Wang,
Programming and inheritance of parental DNA methylomes in mammals.
2014,
Pubmed
Wang,
GSA: Genome Sequence Archive<sup/>.
2017,
Pubmed
Xiang,
Single base-resolution methylome of the silkworm reveals a sparse epigenomic map.
2010,
Pubmed
Xie,
Epigenomic analysis of multilineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells.
2013,
Pubmed
Yan,
Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells.
2013,
Pubmed
Zemach,
Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation.
2010,
Pubmed