Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
BMC Dev Biol
2010 Nov 29;10:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-10-117.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Visceral regeneration in a sea cucumber involves extensive expression of survivin and mortalin homologs in the mesothelium.
Mashanov VS
,
Zueva OR
,
Rojas-Catagena C
,
Garcia-Arraras JE
.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The proper balance of cell division and cell death is of crucial importance for all kinds of developmental processes and for maintaining tissue homeostasis in mature tissues. Dysregulation of this balance often results in severe pathologies, such as cancer. There is a growing interest in understanding the factors that govern the interplay between cell death and proliferation under various conditions. Survivin and mortalin are genes that are known to be implicated in both mitosis and apoptosis and are often expressed in tumors.
RESULTS: The present study takes advantage of the ability of the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima Selenka, 1867 (Holothuroidea, Aspidochirota) to discard its viscera and completely regrow them. This visceral regeneration involves an extensive expression of survivin and mortalin transcripts in the gut mesothelium (the outer tissue layer of the digestive tube), which coincides in time with drastic de-differentiation and a burst in cell division and apoptosis. Double labeling experiments (in situ hybridization combined with TUNEL assay or with BrdU immunohistochemistry) suggest that both genes support cell proliferation, while survivin might also be involved in suppression of the programmed cell death.
CONCLUSIONS: Visceral regeneration in the sea cucumber H. glaberrima is accompanied by elevated levels of cell division and cell death, and, moreover, involves expression of pro-cancer genes, such as survivin and mortalin, which are known to support proliferation and inhibit apoptosis. Nevertheless, once regeneration is completed and the expression pattern of both genes returns to normal, the regrown digestive tube shows no anomalies. This strongly suggests that sea cucumbers must possess some robust cancer-suppression mechanisms that allow rapid re-growth of the adult tissues without leading to runaway tumor development.
Figure 1. Domain organization of the predicted survivin and mortalin proteins of H. glaberrima.
Figure 2. Diagram summarizing the anatomical features of the non-eviscerated (normal) and regenerating digestive tube and the expression patterns of survivin and mortalin in H. glaberrima. (A) Non-eviscerated animals (on the anatomical drawing, the gut mesenteria are not shown). (B) - (E) Regenerating animals at day 2, 7, 14, and 21, respectively. 1di - first descending intestine; 2di - second descending intestine; ai - ascending intestine; c - cloaca; ct - connective tissue layer; de - digestive (luminal) epithelium; dm - dorsal mesentery; e - esophagus; m - mesothelium; pb - pharyngeal bulb; vm - ventral mesentery. All anatomical drawings are positioned with the anterior to the top. The arrows indicate the position of the representative transverse sections. Colors indicate the following: blue - in situ hybridization signal; green - non-eviscerated ('old') tissues; red - regenerating ('new') tissues; black - lumen of the digestive tube. Not to scale.
Figure 3. In situ hybridization. Expression of survivin (A and B) and mortalin (C - E) in the tissues of the digestive tube in non-eviscerated animals. (A) and (B) survivin expression in the scattered cells of the luminal epithelium in the esophagus (A) and the second descending intestine (B). (C) mortalin transcripts widely expressed in the apical region of the mesothelium in the esophagus. (D) Asymmetric distribution of mortalin transcripts in the distal region of the mesentery attached to the second descending intestine. (E) mortalin-expressing cell in the luminal epithelium of the cloaca. Arrows indicate rare cells showing in situ hybridization signal. de - digestive (luminal) epithelium; ct - connective tissue layer; m - mesothelium; vm - ventral mesentery. Scale bars = 50 μm in (A) - (C); 100 μm in (D); 200 μm in (E).
Figure 4. In situ hybridization. Expression of survivin at early stages of gut regeneration (days 2 - 6 after evisceration). (A) Digestive (luminal) epithelium of the cloaca on day 2. (B) Free distal edge of the posterior mesentery on day 2. The inset shows a higher magnification view of the boxed area. (C) The stump of the esophagus on day 2. (D) Wall of the cloaca on day 6. (E) A low-magnification view of the posterior regenerate on day 6. (F) Higher magnification of the boxed area on (E) showing a furrow (arrowhead) of the coelomic epithelium. (G) Esophageal stump on day 6. The inset shows a lower magnification view of the cross-section of the stump. (H) Free distal margin of the anterior mesentery on day 6. de - digestive (luminal) epithelium; dm - dorsal mesentery; ct - connective tissue layer; l - lumen of the gut; m - mesothelium; vm - ventral mesentery. Scale bars = 50 μm in (A), (B inset), (F) and (G); 100 μm in (B), (G inset), and (H); 200 μm in (C) - (E).
Figure 5. In situ hybridization. Expression of survivin at advanced stages of gut regeneration (days 12 - 21 after evisceration). (A) Section through the posterior rudiment at its attachment to the cloaca on day 12. (B) High magnification view of the boxed area on (A). (C) Section through the posterior regenerate at a more anterior level relative to (A). (D) and (E) show high magnification views of the boxed areas on (C), representing the mesenterial attachment and the digestive epithelium, respectively. (F) The wall of the esophageal stump on day 12. (G) and (H) Sequential sections trough the tip of the blindly ended anterior rudiment on day 12. (I) and (J) The wall of the posterior portion of the regenerated digestive tube on day 21, showing scatted labeled cells in the luminal (digestive) epithelium (I) and no labeling in the mesothelium (J). (K) The wall of the anterior region of the regenerated gut on day 21, showing expression of survivin in the mesothelium. de - digestive (luminal) epithelium; ct - connective tissue layer; m - mesothelium. Scale bars = 100 μm in (A), (D), (G), (H); 50 μm in (B), (E), (I), and (J); 200 μm in (C); 25 μm in (F) and (K).
Figure 6. In situ hybridization. Expression of mortalin in gut tissues on day 2 after evisceration. (A) Patchy in situ hybridization signal in the mesothelium of the anterior region of the cloaca. The inset shows a detailed view of the mesothelium corresponding to the boxed area on the main image. (B) Low-magnification view of the posterior mesentery. (C) A higher magnification of the free distal edge of the posterior mesentery - boxed area in (B) - showing strong hybridization signal in some cells of the mesothelium. (D) Ventral (anti-mesenterial) region of the esophageal stump showing very weak and restricted in situ hybridization signal (arrow) in the mesothelium. (E) Low-magnification view of the anterior mesentery. (F) Magnified view of the boxed area in (E) showing strongly labeled cells in the mesothelium of the free distal edge of the mesentery. de - digestive (luminal) epithelium; ct - connective tissue layer; m - mesothelium. Scale bars = 100 μm in (A), (B), (D), and (E); 25 μm in (A inset) and (C); 50 μm in (F).
Figure 7. In situ hybridization. Expression of mortalin in gut tissues on day 6 after evisceration. (A) In situ hybridization signal in the mesothelium of the posterior rudiment. Note that the signal is weak or completely absent from the anti-mesenterial region of the rudiment (arrow) and from the bottom of mesothelial furrows (arrowhead). The inset shows a low-magnification view of the posterior rudiment with the boxed area corresponding to the main image. (B) The posterior tip of the esophageal stump. Note strong in situ hybridization signal in the mesothelium and moderate signal in the luminal (digestive) epithelium. (C) Strong expression of mortalin in the mesothelium of the anterior mesentery. de - digestive (luminal) epithelium; ct - connective tissue layer; m - mesothelium. Scale bars = 50 μm in (A); 200 μm in (A inset); 100 μm in (B) and (C).
Figure 8. In situ hybridization. Expression of mortalin at advanced stages (days 12 - 21) of gut regeneration. (A) Posterior rudiment on day 12 after autotomy. (B) Growing posterior tip of the anterior rudiment on day 12 after evisceration. (C) The wall of the esophageal stump on day 12 after evisceration. (D) The wall of the newly regenerated posterior regions of the esophagus on day 21 after evisceration. (E) The second descending part of the newly regenerated intestine on day 21 after evisceration. The inserts show higher magnification view of the asymmetrical expression of mortalin in the mesothelium of the mesentery attachment and also strongly labeled singly scattered cells in other regions of the mesothelium. de - digestive (luminal) epithelium; ct - connective tissue layer; m - mesothelium. Scale bars = 200 μm in (A) and (E); 500 μm in (B); 25 μm in (C), (D) and (E insets).
Figure 9. Real-time RT-qPCR. Overall abundance of survivin and mortalin transcripts in the regenerating digestive tube. (A) and (B) Survivin expression in the anterior and posterior regenerates, respectively. (C) and (D) Mortalin expression in the anterior and posterior regenerates, respectively. Transcript abundance is expressed as x-fold relative to the normal gut. Results are represented as mean ± standard error. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Figure 10. TUNEL assay. Percentage of apoptotic cells in tissue layers of the normal and regenerating digestive tube. (A) Cell death in the anterior regenerate. (B) Apoptosis in the posterior regenerate. Results are represented as mean ± standard error. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Figure 11. Representative micrographs of the distribution of TUNEL-positive cells (green) in the normal gut and in the early regenerates (days 3 - 7). (A) Wall of the esophagus in a non-eviscerated animal. (B) Wall of the second descending intestine in a non-eviscerated animal. (C) and (D) The anterior and posterior regenerates, respectively, on day 3. (E) and (F) General view of the anterior and posterior regenerates, respectively, on day 7. (E') and (F') Higher magnification of the boxed areas on (E) and (F), respectively. de - digestive (luminal) epithelium; ct - connective tissue layer; m - mesothelium. TUNEL-positive cells are green; nuclei were stained with DAPI and are shown in blue. Scale bars = 50 μm in (A), (E'), and (F'); 100 μm in (B) - (D); 200 μm in (E) and (F).
Figure 12. Representative micrographs of the distribution of TUNEL-positive cells during the late phase (days 14 and 21) of visceral regeneration. (A) and (B) The anterior and posterior regenerates, respectively on day 14. (C) and (D) The newly regenerated posterior region of the esophagus and the second descending intestine on day 21 after evisceration. Insets show higher magnification views of the gut wall. de - digestive (luminal) epithelium; ct - connective tissue layer; l - gut lumen; m - mesothelium; vm - visceral mesentery. TUNEL-positive cells are green; nuclei were stained with DAPI and are shown in blue. Scale bars = 200 μm in (A) - (D); 50 μm in all insets.
Figure 13. Double labeling with riboprobes for survivin and mortalin (blue) and TUNEL assay (green) on the posterior regenerate on day 7. (A) - (C) Survivin riboprobe and TUNEL assay. (D) - (F) Mortalin riboprobe and TUNEL assay. vm - ventral mesentery. Arrowhead on (D) - (F) marks the anti-mesenterial region of the rudiment, where mortalin transcript are absent. Note a negative correlation between the localization of survivin in situ hybridization signal and the density of the TUNEL-positive cells (A) - (C). Scale bars = 100 μm.
Figure 14. Double labeling with riboprobes for survivin and mortalin (blue) and BrdU immunocytochemistry (green) on the posterior regenerate on day 7. (A) - (C) Survivin riboprobe and BrdU immunohistochemstry. (D) - (F) Mortalin riboprobe and BrdU immunohistochemistry. Note that BrdU-incorporating cells are mostly distributed within the expression domains of survivin (A) - (C) and mortalin (D) - (F). Scale bars = 100 μm.
Adida,
Developmentally regulated expression of the novel cancer anti-apoptosis gene survivin in human and mouse differentiation.
1998, Pubmed
Adida,
Developmentally regulated expression of the novel cancer anti-apoptosis gene survivin in human and mouse differentiation.
1998,
Pubmed
Altieri,
New wirings in the survivin networks.
2008,
Pubmed
Ambrosini,
A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma.
1997,
Pubmed
Baba,
Survivin is upregulated during liver regeneration in rats and humans and is associated with hepatocyte proliferation.
2009,
Pubmed
Bukau,
The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines.
1998,
Pubmed
Byrne,
The morphology of autotomy structures in the sea cucumber Eupentacta quinquesemita before and during evisceration.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Conte,
A mortalin-like gene is crucial for planarian stem cell viability.
2009,
Pubmed
Deguchi,
Expression of survivin during liver regeneration.
2002,
Pubmed
Delvaeye,
Role of the 2 zebrafish survivin genes in vasculo-angiogenesis, neurogenesis, cardiogenesis and hematopoiesis.
2009,
Pubmed
Dor,
How important are adult stem cells for tissue maintenance?
2004,
Pubmed
Dubrez-Daloz,
IAPs: more than just inhibitors of apoptosis proteins.
2008,
Pubmed
Fortugno,
Survivin exists in immunochemically distinct subcellular pools and is involved in spindle microtubule function.
2002,
Pubmed
García-Arrarás,
Visceral regeneration in holothurians.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
García-Arrarás,
Echinoderms: potential model systems for studies on muscle regeneration.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
García-Arrarás,
Cellular mechanisms of intestine regeneration in the sea cucumber, Holothuria glaberrima Selenka (Holothuroidea:Echinodermata).
1998,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Gianani,
Expression of survivin in normal, hyperplastic, and neoplastic colonic mucosa.
2001,
Pubmed
Gurley,
Stem cells in animal models of regeneration
2008,
Pubmed
Iosefson,
Reconstitution of the mitochondrial Hsp70 (mortalin)-p53 interaction using purified proteins--identification of additional interacting regions.
2010,
Pubmed
Johnson,
Cell-specific DNA fragmentation may be attenuated by a survivin-dependent mechanism after traumatic brain injury in rats.
2005,
Pubmed
Johnson,
Survivin: a bifunctional inhibitor of apoptosis protein.
2004,
Pubmed
Kaul,
Three faces of mortalin: a housekeeper, guardian and killer.
2007,
Pubmed
Kung,
Liver development, regeneration, and carcinogenesis.
2010,
Pubmed
Larkin,
Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0.
2007,
Pubmed
Letunic,
SMART 6: recent updates and new developments.
2009,
Pubmed
Li,
Survivin study: what is the next wave?
2003,
Pubmed
Li,
Generation of a novel transgenic mouse model for bioluminescent monitoring of survivin gene activity in vivo at various pathophysiological processes: survivin expression overlaps with stem cell markers.
2010,
Pubmed
Li,
Role of the Survivin gene in pathophysiology.
2006,
Pubmed
Li,
Apoptotic cells activate the "phoenix rising" pathway to promote wound healing and tissue regeneration.
2010,
Pubmed
Ma,
Mortalin controls centrosome duplication via modulating centrosomal localization of p53.
2006,
Pubmed
Ma,
The role of survivin in angiogenesis during zebrafish embryonic development.
2007,
Pubmed
Marconi,
Survivin identifies keratinocyte stem cells and is downregulated by anti-beta1 integrin during anoikis.
2007,
Pubmed
Marusawa,
HBXIP functions as a cofactor of survivin in apoptosis suppression.
2003,
Pubmed
Mashanov,
Transdifferentiation in holothurian gut regeneration.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Mita,
Survivin: key regulator of mitosis and apoptosis and novel target for cancer therapeutics.
2008,
Pubmed
Pearson,
Regeneration, stem cells, and the evolution of tumor suppression.
2008,
Pubmed
Pfaffl,
A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR.
2001,
Pubmed
Quiñones,
Extracellular matrix remodeling and metalloproteinase involvement during intestine regeneration in the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Rojas-Cartagena,
Distinct profiles of expressed sequence tags during intestinal regeneration in the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Ruchaud,
The chromosomal passenger complex: one for all and all for one.
2007,
Pubmed
Ryan,
Survivin: a new target for anti-cancer therapy.
2009,
Pubmed
Storelli,
Heavy metals in the aquatic environment of the Southern Adriatic Sea, Italy: macroalgae, sediments and benthic species.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Tseng,
Apoptosis is required during early stages of tail regeneration in Xenopus laevis.
2007,
Pubmed
Wadhwa,
Hsp70 family member, mot-2/mthsp70/GRP75, binds to the cytoplasmic sequestration domain of the p53 protein.
2002,
Pubmed
Wadhwa,
Upregulation of mortalin/mthsp70/Grp75 contributes to human carcinogenesis.
2006,
Pubmed
Waterhouse,
Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench.
2009,
Pubmed
Wilkie,
Autotomy as a prelude to regeneration in echinoderms.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Xia,
A survivin-ran complex regulates spindle formation in tumor cells.
2008,
Pubmed
Yang,
Cell division and cell survival in the absence of survivin.
2004,
Pubmed
Yi,
Association of mortalin (HSPA9) with liver cancer metastasis and prediction for early tumor recurrence.
2008,
Pubmed
Yue,
Deconstructing Survivin: comprehensive genetic analysis of Survivin function by conditional knockout in a vertebrate cell line.
2008,
Pubmed
Zdobnov,
InterProScan--an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro.
2001,
Pubmed