Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
PeerJ
2023 Jan 01;11:e16264. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16264.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Comparison of feeding preferences of herbivorous fishes and the sea urchin Diadema antillarum in Little Cayman.
Spiers L
,
Frazer TK
.
Abstract
On Caribbean coral reefs, losses of two key groups of grazers, herbivorous fishes and Diadema antillarum, coincided with dramatic increases in macroalgae, which have contributed to decreases in the resilience of these coral reefs and continued low coral cover. In some locations, herbivorous reef fishes and D. antillarum populations have begun to recover, and reductions in macroalgal cover and abundance have followed. Harder to determine, and perhaps more important, are the combined grazing effects of herbivorous fishes and D. antillarum on the structure of macroalgal communities. Surprisingly few studies have examined the feeding preferences of D. antillarum for different macroalgal species, and there have been even fewer comparative studies between these different herbivore types. Accordingly, a series of in-situ and ex-situ feeding assays involving herbivorous fishes and D. antillarum were used to examine feeding preferences. Ten macrophytes representing palatable and chemically and/or structurally defended species were used in these assays, including nine macroalgae, and one seagrass. All species were eaten by at least one of the herbivores tested, although consumption varied greatly. All herbivores consumed significant portions of two red algae species while avoiding Halimeda tuna, which has both chemical and structural defenses. Herbivorous fishes mostly avoided chemically defended species while D. antillarum consumed less of the structurally defended algae. These results suggest complementarity and redundancy in feeding by these different types of herbivores indicating the most effective macroalgal control and subsequent restoration of degraded coral reefs may depend on the recovery of both herbivorous fishes and D. antillarum.
Figure 1. Photographs of macrophytes used in feeding assays.Photographs show Dictyota sp. (A) Palisada sp. (B) Laurencia sp. 2 (C) Lobophora sp. (D) Turbinaria sp. (E) Galaxaura sp. (F) Halimeda tuna (G) Laurencia sp. 1 (H) Padina sp. (I) and the seagrass Thalassia testudinum (J) Insets are included to show details of some of the macroalgae.
Figure 3. Proportion of pieces of each macrophyte eaten by fish at the shallow (A–G) and deep (H–N) sites.Each panel represents an individual trial (n = 14) deployed for 24 h. Data analyzed using a G-test followed by Fisher’s exact tests, and letters indicate significant differences.
Figure 4. Comparison of proportion eaten among macrophyte species (x-axis) at the shallow (A) and deep (B) site as well as a direct comparison between sites (C).Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed effects model followed by post-hoc least-squares means tests to determine differences within and between sites. Letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in proportion consumed within each site and * indicates significant differences for each macrophyte (p < 0.05) between sites.
Figure 5. Abundance of each herbivorous fish species (±SE) per m2 found at the shallow and deep site.Values acquired from visual surveys along belt transects at the shallow (n = 4) and deep (n = 3) sites.
Figure 6. Percent of bites by each herbivorous fish on each macrophyte across both shallow (A) and deep (B) sites.Bite numbers obtained from video recordings of the assays. For Sparisoma species, (I) indicates initial phase fish and (T) indicates terminal phase. Species that were recorded taking less than 1 bite per hour of macrophytes are not shown in the figure.
Figure 7. Amount in grams of each macrophyte ± standard error eaten by Diadema antillarum in choice feeding assays in December 2017 (A–G) and May 2018 (H).Different letters indicate significant differences when analyzed by Friedman’s tests followed by Student-Newman-Keuls tests.
Bellwood,
Sleeping functional group drives coral-reef recovery.
2006, Pubmed
Bellwood,
Sleeping functional group drives coral-reef recovery.
2006,
Pubmed
Bonaldo,
Seaweed-coral interactions: variance in seaweed allelopathy, coral susceptibility, and potential effects on coral resilience.
2014,
Pubmed
Burkepile,
Herbivore species richness and feeding complementarity affect community structure and function on a coral reef.
2008,
Pubmed
Carpenter,
Mass mortality of a Caribbean sea urchin: Immediate effects on community metabolism and other herbivores.
1988,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Cramer,
Widespread loss of Caribbean acroporid corals was underway before coral bleaching and disease outbreaks.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Donovan,
Local conditions magnify coral loss after marine heatwaves.
2021,
Pubmed
Edmunds,
Recovery of Diadema antillarum reduces macroalgal cover and increases abundance of juvenile corals on a Caribbean reef.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Edwards,
Global assessment of the status of coral reef herbivorous fishes: evidence for fishing effects.
2014,
Pubmed
Erickson,
Palatability of macroalgae that use different types of chemical defenses.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Gardner,
Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals.
2003,
Pubmed
Hay,
Predictable spatial escapes from herbivory: how do these affect the evolution of herbivore resistance in tropical marine communities?
1984,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Hay,
Chemical Defense Against Diverse Coral-Reef Herbivores.
1987,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Holbrook,
Coral Reef Resilience, Tipping Points and the Strength of Herbivory.
2016,
Pubmed
Hughes,
Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs.
2003,
Pubmed
Lefcheck,
Tropical fish diversity enhances coral reef functioning across multiple scales.
2019,
Pubmed
Lessios,
The Great Diadema antillarum Die-Off: 30 Years Later.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Lessios,
Spread of diadema mass mortality through the Caribbean.
1984,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Lewis,
Herbivory on coral reefs: algal susceptibility to herbivorous fishes.
1985,
Pubmed
Lockwood Iii,
On the statistical analysis of multiple-choice feeding preference experiments.
1998,
Pubmed
Mendes,
The omnivorous triggerfish Melichthys niger is a functional herbivore on an isolated Atlantic oceanic island.
2019,
Pubmed
Mouillot,
Functional over-redundancy and high functional vulnerability in global fish faunas on tropical reefs.
2014,
Pubmed
Mumby,
Thresholds and the resilience of Caribbean coral reefs.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Mumby,
Marine reserves, fisheries ban, and 20 years of positive change in a coral reef ecosystem.
2021,
Pubmed
Ogden,
Grazing by the Echinoid Diadema antillarum Philippi: Formation of Halos around West Indian Patch Reefs.
1973,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Rasher,
Chemically rich seaweeds poison corals when not controlled by herbivores.
2010,
Pubmed
Roff,
Global disparity in the resilience of coral reefs.
2012,
Pubmed
Targett,
Biogeographic comparisons of marine algal polyphenolics: evidence against a latitudinal trend.
1992,
Pubmed
Vieira,
Diversity, Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of the Prevalent Brown Algal Genus Lobophora in the Greater Caribbean Sea, Including the Description of Five New Species1.
2020,
Pubmed