Pratchett MS et al. (2012), Specialization in habitat use by coral reef dam...

ECB-ART-42641

Ecol Evol 2012 Sep 01;29:2168-80. doi: 10.1002/ece3.321.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Specialization in habitat use by coral reef damselfishes and their susceptibility to habitat loss.

Pratchett MS , Coker DJ , Jones GP , Munday PL .

???displayArticle.abstract???
While it is generally assumed that specialist species are more vulnerable to disturbance compared with generalist counterparts, this has rarely been tested in coastal marine ecosystems, which are increasingly subject to a wide range of natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Habitat specialists are expected to be more vulnerable to habitat loss because habitat availability exerts a greater limitation on population size, but it is also possible that specialist species may escape effects of disturbance if they use habitats that are generally resilient to disturbance. This study quantified specificity in use of different coral species by six coral-dwelling damselfishes (Chromis viridis, C. atripectoralis, Dascyllus aruanus, D. reticulatus, Pomacentrus moluccensis, and P. amboinensis) and related habitat specialization to proportional declines in their abundance following habitat degradation caused by outbreaks of the coral eating starfish, Acanthaster planci. The coral species preferred by most coral-dwelling damselfishes (e.g., Pocillopora damicornis) were frequently consumed by coral eating crown-of-thorns starfish, such that highly specialized damselfishes were disproportionately affected by coral depletion, despite using a narrower range of different coral species. Vulnerability of damselfishes to this disturbance was strongly correlated with both their reliance on corals and their degree of habitat specialization. Ongoing disturbances to coral reef ecosystems are expected, therefore, to lead to fundamental shifts in the community structure of fish communities where generalists are favored over highly specialist species.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 23139876
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC3488668
???displayArticle.link??? Ecol Evol

Genes referenced: LOC105441782

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

References [+] :

Aitken, Resource selection plasticity and community responses to experimental reduction of a critical resource. 2008, Pubmed

Aitken, Resource selection plasticity and community responses to experimental reduction of a critical resource. 2008, Pubmed
Bellwood, Confronting the coral reef crisis. 2004, Pubmed
Beukers, Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef fish population. 1998, Pubmed
Bruno, Regional decline of coral cover in the Indo-Pacific: timing, extent, and subregional comparisons. 2007, Pubmed
Charrette, Range-restricted, specialist Bornean butterflies are less likely to recover from ENSO-induced disturbance. 2006, Pubmed
Connell, Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. 1978, Pubmed
Feary, Habitat choice, recruitment and the response of coral reef fishes to coral degradation. 2007, Pubmed , Echinobase
Fisher, Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the decline and extinction of Australian marsupials. 2003, Pubmed
Gardner, Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. 2003, Pubmed
Holbrook, Spatial patterns in abundance of a damselfish reflect availability of suitable habitat. 2000, Pubmed
Hughes, Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. 2003, Pubmed
Jackson, Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. 2001, Pubmed
Jones, Coral decline threatens fish biodiversity in marine reserves. 2004, Pubmed
Kotze, Species decline--but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. 2003, Pubmed
Lawton, High gene flow across large geographic scales reduces extinction risk for a highly specialised coral feeding butterflyfish. 2011, Pubmed
McClanahan, Comparing bleaching and mortality responses of hard corals between southern Kenya and the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. 2004, Pubmed
Munday, Fitness consequences of habitat use and competition among coral-dwelling fishes. 2001, Pubmed
Vázquez, Ecological specialization and susceptibility to disturbance: conjectures and refutations. 2002, Pubmed
Wilson, Habitat utilization by coral reef fish: implications for specialists vs. generalists in a changing environment. 2008, Pubmed , Echinobase

	Figure 1. Proportional use of 10 habitat categories by each of the six species of damselfishes in 1998 and 1999. Based on log-linear analyses, only Pomacentrus moluccensis exhibited significant differences in patterns of habitat use between years.
	Figure 2. (a) Availability and (b) occupation (across all damselfishes) of predominant coral habitats used by coral-dwelling damselfishes at Lizard Island (northern Great Barrier Reef) in 1998 and 1999. “*” Indicates significant changes in availability and occupation between years.
	Figure 3. Mean abundance ± SE of damselfishes in crest and slope habitats at sites affected by outbreaks of Acanthaster planci, versus unaffected (natural control) sites in 1998 and 1999.
	Figure 4. Proportional declines in the abundance of coral-dwelling damselfishes relative to (a) the proportional use of dead coral habitat (considered to be indicative of coral dependence), and (b) the number of different coral species actually used (as a measure of specialization). Damselfishes that are almost always found within live corals (obligate coral-dwelling species) are indicated by filled circles, whereas damselfishes that use live corals but frequently use dead coral habitats (facultative coral-dwelling species) are indicated by open circles. Data were pooled across all sites and across zones.