Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Abstract
Cell-cell fusion is limited to only a few cell types in the body of most organisms and sperm and eggs are paradigmatic in this process. The specialized cellular mechanism of fertilization includes the timely exposure of gamete-specific interaction proteins by the sperm as it approaches the egg. Bindin in sea urchin sperm is one such gamete interaction protein and it enables species-specific interaction with a homotypic egg. We recently showed that Bindin is essential for fertilization by use of Cas9 targeted gene inactivation in the sea urchin, Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus. Here we show phenotypic details of Bindin-minus sperm. Sperm lacking Bindin do not bind to nor fertilize eggs at even high concentrations, yet they otherwise have wildtype morphology and function. These features include head shape, tail length and beating frequency, an acrosomal vesicle, a nuclear fossa, and they undergo an acrosomal reaction. The only phenotypic differences between wildtype and Bindin-minus sperm identified is that Bindin-minus sperm have a slightly shorter head, likely as a result of an acrosome lacking Bindin. These data, and the observation that Bindin-minus embryos develop normally and metamorphose into normal functioning adults, support the contention that Bindin functions are limited to species-specific sperm-egg interactions. We conclude that the evolutionary divergence of Bindin is not constrained by any other biological roles.
Figure 1. A wildtype adult H. pulcherrimus seen from the dorsal (aboral) surface (A). Bindin-null adults (B and C) are indistinguishable from the wildtype adults, and throughout their developmental progression to this point (not shown). Wildtype sperm activate eggs within moments of exposure, resulting in formation of the fertilization envelop (D). In contrast, Bindin-null sperm never activate an egg, even after prolonged exposure (E). See also Video S1 in the Supplemental Material. Scale bar in C = 1 cm for AâC; Scale barâin E =â40 µm for D and E.
Figure 2. Fertilization assays using increasing sperm concentrations (from 100 sperm to over 10 million sperm per milliliter). Eggs of a single female were used for sperm from each male (AâD)Â throughout these assays. Two independent cycles of experiments were performed and one cycle of the dataset is shown. Bindin #2 represents sperm from an adult whose embryos were injected with Cas9 and gRNAs, yet no mutations were detectable in this animal. (Male B2 in Table #1).
Figure 3. Phenotypic comparison of Wildtype and bindinâKO sperm. Flagellar beat frequency and tail length are nearly identical between the wildtype and Bindin-null sperm. (A) Average values of tail beat frequency. (B) Head dimensions of individual animal values. N shows number of batches measured and n shows number of sperm measured. The bindin-KO sperm batches used for this measurement were B1, B3, and B4 of Table 1. (C) Summary of quantitative sperm morphometry. Statistical significance: Tail length pâ>â0.05, flagellar beat pâ>â0.05, head length pâ<â0.005, head width pâ>â0.05, ratio of head length to head width pâ<â0.005.
Figure 4. (A) Swimming sperm of wildtype (left) and Bindin-null (right) sperm from Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus. Image contrast has been enhanced using Image-J (ver.1.52a). Note that sperm from the Bindin-null sperm has similar head and tail morphometrics. (B) Flagellar profile from 45 successive traces of sperm. Note subtle variations between samples though essential profiles are consistent. Scale bars: 10 µm.
Figure 5. TEM of Wildtype and Bindin-null sperm. Note the acrosome of the wildtype sperm (white arrow) with densely packed Bindin. Three representative sperm from the bindin-KO adult (Bindin #3) still have an acrosomal vesicle, but it appears less dense, and vacuolated. Note the horseshoe shaped fossa (asterisks) within the sperm nucleus even in the sperm lacking bindin. Scale barâ=â0.5 µm.
Figure 6. TEM of Wildtype and bindin-KO sperm following exposure to egg jelly that stimulates the acrosome reaction. Note the acrosomal process (white arrow) in both wildtype and bindin-KO. Scale barâ=â0.5 µm.
Brinkman,
Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition.
2014, Pubmed
Brinkman,
Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition.
2014,
Pubmed
Connolly,
Disruption of murine Tenr results in teratospermia and male infertility.
2005,
Pubmed
Dix,
Targeted gene disruption of Hsp70-2 results in failed meiosis, germ cell apoptosis, and male infertility.
1996,
Pubmed
Dong,
Detecting coevolution of positively selected in turtles sperm-egg fusion proteins.
2019,
Pubmed
Geyer,
Slow evolution under purifying selection in the gamete recognition protein bindin of the sea urchin Diadema.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Glabe,
Species specific agglutination of eggs by bindin isolated from sea urchin sperm.
1977,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Grayson,
Izumo1 and Juno: the evolutionary origins and coevolution of essential sperm-egg binding partners.
2015,
Pubmed
Grayson,
Positive Selection and the Evolution of izumo Genes in Mammals.
2012,
Pubmed
Guo,
Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis.
2014,
Pubmed
Inoue,
The immunoglobulin superfamily protein Izumo is required for sperm to fuse with eggs.
2005,
Pubmed
Kinjo,
HpBase: A genome database of a sea urchin, Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Levine,
Evidence of an acrosin-like enzyme in sea urchin sperm.
1978,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Moreno-Mateos,
CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo.
2015,
Pubmed
Ohmuro,
Progression of flagellar stages during artificially delayed motility initiation in sea urchin sperm.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Palumbi,
Speciation and the evolution of gamete recognition genes: pattern and process.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Ren,
A sperm ion channel required for sperm motility and male fertility.
2001,
Pubmed
Schatten,
Nuclear lamins and peripheral nuclear antigens during fertilization and embryogenesis in mice and sea urchins.
1985,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Shevidi,
Single nucleotide editing without DNA cleavage using CRISPR/Cas9-deaminase in the sea urchin embryo.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Swanson,
The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins.
2002,
Pubmed
Vacquier,
What have we learned about sea urchin sperm bindin?
1995,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Vacquier,
The quest for the sea urchin egg receptor for sperm.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Vacquier,
Isolation of bindin: the protein responsible for adhesion of sperm to sea urchin eggs.
1977,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Vicens,
Coevolution of positively selected IZUMO1 and CD9 in rodents: evidence of interaction between gamete fusion proteins?
2014,
Pubmed
Wada,
Effects of the dynein inhibitor ciliobrevin on the flagellar motility of sea urchin spermatozoa.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Wessel,
Bindin is essential for fertilization in the sea urchin.
2021,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Wessel,
Genetic manipulation of the pigment pathway in a sea urchin reveals distinct lineage commitment prior to metamorphosis in the bilateral to radial body plan transition.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Yajima,
Study of larval and adult skeletogenic cells in developing sea urchin larvae.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Yan,
Male infertility caused by spermiogenic defects: lessons from gene knockouts.
2009,
Pubmed
Zigler,
The evolution of sea urchin sperm bindin.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase