Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The brittle star Amphiura filiformis, which regenerates its arms post autotomy, is emerging as a useful model for studying the molecular underpinnings of regeneration, aided by the recent availability of some molecular resources. During regeneration a blastema initially is formed distally to the amputation site, and then a rapid rebuild is obtained by adding metameric units, which will eventually differentiate and become fully functional. In this work we first characterize the developmental process of the regenerating arms using two differentiation markers for muscle and skeletal structures - Afi-trop-1 and Afi-αcoll. Both genes are not expressed in the blastema and newly added undifferentiated metameric units. Their expression at different regenerating stages shows an early segregation of muscle and skeletal cells during the regenerating process, long before the metameric units become functional. We then studied the expression of a set of genes orthologous of the sea urchin transcription factors involved in the development of skeletal and non-skeletal mesoderm: Afi-ets1/2, Afi-alx1, Afi-tbr, Afi-foxB and Afi-gataC. We found that Afi-ets1/2, Afi-alx1, Afi-foxB and Afi-gataC are all expressed at the blastemal stage. As regeneration progresses those genes are expressed in a similar small undifferentiated domain beneath the distal growth cap, while in more advanced metameric units they become restricted to different skeletal domains. Afi-foxB becomes expressed in non-skeletal structures. This suggests that they might play a combinatorial role only in the early cell specification process and that subsequently they function independently in the differentiation of different structures. Afi-tbr is not present in the adult arm tissue at any stage of regeneration. In situ hybridization results have been confirmed with a new strategy for quantitative PCR (QPCR), using a subdivision of the three stages of regeneration into proximal (differentiated) and distal (undifferentiated) arm segments.
Fig. 1. (aâd) Schematic diagram of muscle and skeletal structures within the brittle star arm. (a) Oral view showing the spines, podia, and lateral and oral arm shields. (b) Aboral view showing spines, and lateral and aboral arm shields. (c) View of internal structures including the vertebrae and the intervertebral muscles. (d) Phalloidin staining revealing muscle structures in the proximal part of the 95% regenerating arm (aboral view). (e, f) Double fluorescent in situ hybridization showing Afi-trop1 localized to the podia (green arrows) at the oral side and intervertebral muscles (yellow arrow) at the aboral side of the 50% (e) and 95% (f) regenerating arm. Afi-αcoll is restricted to lateral arm shields and the base of the spines. The two differentiation markers are not co-expressed and neither is found at the distal tip (blue arrow) of the regenerating arm which confirms their use as markers for specified structures. (g,h) Chromogenic single in situ hybridization clearly showing expression in 95% regenerating arms of Afi-trop1 in the intervertebral muscles (yellow arrows) as well as the podia and Afi-αcoll in the lateral shields and base of the spines. Scale bars â 100 μm. Green â muscle structures, red â skeletal structures, 1 â oral arm shield, 2 â lateral arm shield, 3 â spines, 4 â aboral arm shields, 5 â vertebrae, A â podia, B â intervertebral muscles. Green arrows â podia, yellow arrows â intervertebral muscles, blue arrows â distal tip. OV â oral view, LV â lateral view. P â proximal, D â distal.
Fig. 2. Structure of the blastema and expression of transcription factors. (A) Formation of metameric units and the specification of the blastema. At the very early regenerative phase the blastema is composed of two layers â an epithelium and the mass of proliferative and unspecified cells, of a total 50â100 cells. As the blastema elongates the proliferative area is becoming restricted to the distal-most tip of the newly forming arm and the blastema is organized into a three-layered structure, formed by the radial water canal, the midlayer and the epithelium. When metameric units defined by the appearance of pronounced podia and spines are being formed at the proximal end of the regenerate, the unspecified proliferative cells are only localized to the distal-most tip forming a growth zone that remains undifferentiated until the end of regeneration. (B) WMISH revealing differential expression patterns of transcription factors Afi-alx1, Afi-ets1/2, Afi-gataC, Afi-tbr and Afi-foxB in the blastema. All genes except for Afi-tbr are expressed in the blastema.Afi-foxB is localized to the epithelium, Afi-ets1/2 is ubiquitous and Afi-alx1 and Afi-gataC are both expressed within the thick midlayer of the blastema but not the distal-most tip. Scale bar: 100 μm, P â proximal, D â distal. White dashed lines â radial water canal.
Fig. 3. Spatial expression of transcription factors Afi-alx1, Afi-ets1/2, Afi-foxB, Afi-tbr and Afi-gataC in the regenerating arm. Afi-tbr is not expressed at all in the regenerating arm. All four remaining genes are strongly upregulated directly beneath the undifferentiated distal cap. Proximal expression of Afi-alx1 is localized to the bases of the spines and podia and Afi-gataC only to the base of the spines, both at the 50% and 95% differentiation stages. Afi-ets1/2 shows a repetitive pattern of expression restricted to the site of developing vertebrae in the proximal regions of the regenerating arm. Expression of Afi-foxB is localized to the non-skeletogenic structures (around the base of the podia). Scale bar: 100 μm. P â proximal, D â distal. Arrowheads â site of developing spines, arrows â site of developing podia, asterisks â intervertebral muscles.
Fig. 4. Quantification of gene expression during brittle star arm regeneration. (a) The differentiation marker Afi-trop1 shows an upregulation in proximal, differentiated and non-regenerating tissue of the arm. (b,d,e) Afi-ets1/2, Afi-foxB and Afi-alx1 are also highly expressed in distal segments of the 50% and 95% differentiated arms. (c) Afi-gataC is downregulated after the blastema stage. (f) Afi-tbr is not expressed in the adult brittle star; a control using embryonic cDNA stages shows that the primers worked. All other transcription factors are most abundantly expressed in the blastema. Error bars represent standard deviation between two biological replicas (n = 15 animals per cDNA batch). At least four experimental replicas were used for each combination of cDNA and primers in each batch. h - hours post fertilisation.
Adoutte,
The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications.
2000, Pubmed
Adoutte,
The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications.
2000,
Pubmed
Bannister,
Afuni, a novel transforming growth factor-beta gene is involved in arm regeneration by the brittle star Amphiura filiformis.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Bannister,
Coelomic expression of a novel bone morphogenetic protein in regenerating arms of the brittle star Amphiura filiformis.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Cameron,
Evolution of the chordate body plan: new insights from phylogenetic analyses of deuterostome phyla.
2000,
Pubmed
Candia Carnevali,
Microscopic overview of crinoid regeneration.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Croce,
The canonical Wnt pathway in embryonic axis polarity.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Davidson,
A provisional regulatory gene network for specification of endomesoderm in the sea urchin embryo.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Dolmatov,
Muscle regeneration in holothurians.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Dubois,
Regeneration of spines and pedicellariae in echinoderms: a review.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Dupont,
Growth or differentiation? Adaptive regeneration in the brittlestar Amphiura filiformis.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Ettensohn,
Alx1, a member of the Cart1/Alx3/Alx4 subfamily of Paired-class homeodomain proteins, is an essential component of the gene network controlling skeletogenic fate specification in the sea urchin embryo.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Gao,
Transfer of a large gene regulatory apparatus to a new developmental address in echinoid evolution.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
García-Arrarás,
Visceral regeneration in holothurians.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Gorzelak,
²⁶Mg labeling of the sea urchin regenerating spine: Insights into echinoderm biomineralization process.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Harkey,
Coordinate accumulation of five transcripts in the primary mesenchyme during skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo.
1988,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Koga,
Functional evolution of Ets in echinoderms with focus on the evolution of echinoderm larval skeletons.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Lee,
PTHrP isoforms have differing effect on chondrogenic differentiation and hypertrophy of mesenchymal stem cells.
2012,
Pubmed
Livingston,
A genome-wide analysis of biomineralization-related proteins in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Mashanov,
Expression of Wnt9, TCTP, and Bmp1/Tll in sea cucumber visceral regeneration.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Materna,
A comprehensive analysis of Delta signaling in pre-gastrular sea urchin embryos.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Minemura,
Evolutionary modification of T-brain (tbr) expression patterns in sand dollar.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Minokawa,
Expression patterns of four different regulatory genes that function during sea urchin development.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Oliveri,
Global regulatory logic for specification of an embryonic cell lineage.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Oliveri,
A regulatory gene network that directs micromere specification in the sea urchin embryo.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Patruno,
Anbmp2/4 is a new member of the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily isolated from a crinoid and involved in regeneration.
2003,
Pubmed
Perry,
Vertebrate tropomyosin: distribution, properties and function.
2001,
Pubmed
Philippe,
Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia.
2005,
Pubmed
Rafiq,
The genomic regulatory control of skeletal morphogenesis in the sea urchin.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Rast,
brachyury Target genes in the early sea urchin embryo isolated by differential macroarray screening.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Rubilar,
Timing of fission in the starfish Allostichaster capensis (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) in laboratory.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Sodergren,
The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Solek,
An ancient role for Gata-1/2/3 and Scl transcription factor homologs in the development of immunocytes.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Steinmetz,
Independent evolution of striated muscles in cnidarians and bilaterians.
2012,
Pubmed
Tautz,
A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback.
1989,
Pubmed
Tu,
Gene structure in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus based on transcriptome analysis.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Tu,
Sea urchin Forkhead gene family: phylogeny and embryonic expression.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Turbeville,
Deuterostome phylogeny and the sister group of the chordates: evidence from molecules and morphology.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Vickery,
Regeneration in echinoderm larvae.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Winchell,
Evaluating hypotheses of deuterostome phylogeny and chordate evolution with new LSU and SSU ribosomal DNA data.
2002,
Pubmed
Zhu,
A large-scale analysis of mRNAs expressed by primary mesenchyme cells of the sea urchin embryo.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase