Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The lack of a reliable and innocuous mark-recapture method has limited studies that would provide essential information for the management of commercial sea cucumbers. Tagging sea cucumbers is notoriously difficult because of their plastic nature and autolysis capacities. The markers that have so far been tested, mainly on or through the body wall, were either lost rapidly or had major drawbacks (e.g. suitable only for batch identification, requiring complex analysis, causing infections, necrosis, behavioural changes and mortality). The present study explored the efficacy of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags for individually marking sea cucumbers by assessing retention rates and long-term side effects of tags inserted in previously unstudied tissues/organs. Individuals of the species Cucumaria frondosa were tagged in the body wall, aquapharyngeal bulb and at the base of the oral tentacles. They were monitored closely for evidence of stress, infection, change in feeding and spawning behaviour and tag retention rate. Implanting the tag in an oral tentacle to reach the hydrovascular system of the aquapharyngeal bulb achieved the best retention rates in full-size individuals: from a maximum of 92% after 30 days to 68% at the end of the experimental period (300 days). Efficacy was lower in smaller individuals (84% after 30 d and 42% after 300 d). Following a slight increase in cloacal movements for 15 h post tagging, no side effect was noted in sea cucumbers tagged in the aquapharyngeal bulb via the tentacles. Feeding and spawning behaviours were not affected and no signs of infections or abnormal cell development in the vicinity of the tags were observed. This study indicates that marking sea cucumbers with 8.2 mm long PIT tags implanted via the oral tentacle is an effective technique, yielding relatively high retention rates over long periods without any detectable physiological or behavioural effects.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
26011165
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC4444348 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One
Fig 1. PIT tag retention rates in sea cucumbers.(A) Retention rates of tags implanted in the body wall and aquapharyngeal bulb during the short-term experiment. (B) Retention rates of tags implanted in the tentacles and body wall during the long-term experiment. TBW, tagged in body wall; TAB, tagged in aquapharyngeal bulb (directly); LT, large individuals tagged in tentacle (to aquapharyngeal bulb); ST, small individuals tagged in tentacle (to aquapharyngeal bulb); LBW, large individuals tagged in body wall; SBW, small individuals tagged in body wall.
Fig 2. X-ray photograph of sea cucumber tagged in the aquapharyngeal bulb.PIT tags successfully implanted in the aquapharyngeal bulb through a deployed tentacle lodged themselves in one of the tentacle vesicles (ve) close to the calcareous ring (cr). Scale bars represent 2 cm.
Fig 3. Localisation of retained PIT tags.(A-C) Tags retained in the aquapharyngeal bulb were found in the vesicles of the tentacles (ve). The calcareous ring (cr) and brown bodies (b) are identified. (D-F) Tags retained in the body wall were implanted in the connective tissue (ct) between the epidermis (ep) and the longitudinal muscle bands (m) below the ambulacral podia. Scale bars represent 2 mm.
Fig 4. Minor side effects and normal behaviours recorded in tagged sea cucumbers.(A) Sea cucumbers tagged in the body wall showing ripples (arrows) around the implantation area immediately after tagging. (B) Large sea cucumbers tagged in the tentacles showed normal feeding, extending their tentacles fully and alternatively inserting them into the mouth. (C) A female sea cucumber tagged in the tentacles is releasing oocytes, visible as a reddish string (arrow), 40 days post tagging. (D) Water clouded with sperm in a tank holding sea cucumbers tagged in the body wall. Scale bars represent 3 cm.
Fig 5. Cloacal movements of tagged, punctured and handled sea cucumbers.(A) Response of sea cucumbers tagged in the body wall. (B) Response of sea cucumbers tagged in the tentacles. Table 4 shows statistical results. TBW, tagged in body wall; PBW, punctured in body wall; TT, tagged in tentacle; PT, punctured in tentacle; Control, handled but not tagged or punctured.
Mactavish,
Deposit-feeding sea cucumbers enhance mineralization and nutrient cycling in organically-enriched coastal sediments.
2012, Pubmed,
Echinobase
Mactavish,
Deposit-feeding sea cucumbers enhance mineralization and nutrient cycling in organically-enriched coastal sediments.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Mercier,
Endogenous and exogenous control of gametogenesis and spawning in echinoderms.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Purcell,
Value, market preferences and trade of Beche-de-mer from Pacific Island sea cucumbers.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Purcell,
The cost of being valuable: predictors of extinction risk in marine invertebrates exploited as luxury seafood.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Rich,
A practical guide to understanding Kaplan-Meier curves.
2010,
Pubmed