Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Echinobase
ECB-ART-31100
J Cell Sci 1992 Sep 01;103 ( Pt 1):125-30. doi: 10.1242/jcs.103.1.125.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Chromosomes attain a metaphase position on half-spindles in the absence of an opposing spindle pole.

Leslie RJ .


???displayArticle.abstract???
To examine the relative roles of chromosomes, spindle poles and microtubules in the formation of the metaphase spindle and metakinesis, I have experimentally placed an extra centrosome-free pronucleus close to a forming bipolar spindle in a living cell. The chromosomes from the extra nucleus induce the formation of an extra half-spindle from one pole of the otherwise normal bipolar spindle with chromosomes positioned at the putative metaphase plate. I conclude that chromosomes determine the location of half-spindles by sustaining a higher than normal density of microtubules. These results are surprising for two reasons: first, because previous in vivo experiments in tissue culture cells show that mono-oriented chromosomes with functional attachments to spindle microtubules do not support half-spindle formation but oscillate unstably or move to one spindle pole. Additionally, the generally accepted view is that chromosomes attain a metastable condition at the metaphase plate as a result of a balance between forces directed to opposite spindle poles. However, our observation that chromosomes on extra half-spindles attain a metastable position in the absence of an opposing spindle pole, suggests that Ostergren''s model does not account for metakinesis in sea urchin embryos.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 1429900
???displayArticle.link??? J Cell Sci


Genes referenced: LOC100887844 LOC115919910 pole