Leal MC et al. (2012), Trends in the discovery of new marine natural p...

ECB-ART-50134

PLoS One 2012 Jan 01;71:e30580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030580.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Trends in the discovery of new marine natural products from invertebrates over the last two decades--where and what are we bioprospecting?

Leal MC , Puga J , Serôdio J , Gomes NC , Calado R .

???displayArticle.abstract???
It is acknowledged that marine invertebrates produce bioactive natural products that may be useful for developing new drugs. By exploring untapped geographical sources and/or novel groups of organisms one can maximize the search for new marine drugs to treat human diseases. The goal of this paper is to analyse the trends associated with the discovery of new marine natural products from invertebrates (NMNPI) over the last two decades. The analysis considers different taxonomical levels and geographical approaches of bioprospected species. Additionally, this research is also directed to provide new insights into less bioprospected taxa and world regions. In order to gather the information available on NMNPI, the yearly-published reviews of Marine Natural Products covering 1990-2009 were surveyed. Information on source organisms, specifically taxonomical information and collection sites, was assembled together with additional geographical information collected from the articles originally describing the new natural product. Almost 10000 NMNPI were discovered since 1990, with a pronounced increase between decades. Porifera and Cnidaria were the two dominant sources of NMNPI worldwide. The exception was polar regions where Echinodermata dominated. The majority of species that yielded the new natural products belong to only one class of each Porifera and Cnidaria phyla (Demospongiae and Anthozoa, respectively). Increased bioprospecting efforts were observed in the Pacific Ocean, particularly in Asian countries that are associated with the Japan Biodiversity Hotspot and the Kuroshio Current. Although results show comparably less NMNPI from polar regions, the number of new natural products per species is similar to that recorded for other regions. The present study provides information to future bioprospecting efforts addressing previously unexplored taxonomic groups and/or regions. We also highlight how marine invertebrates, which in some cases have no commercial value, may become highly valuable in the ongoing search for new drugs from the sea.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 22276216
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC3262841
???displayArticle.link??? PLoS One

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

References [+] :

Bickford, Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. 2007, Pubmed

	Figure 1. New natural products from marine invertebrate phyla.Cumulative number of new natural products discovered from different marine invertebrate phyla from 1990 to 2009 (Group “Other phyla” include Annelida, Arthropoda, Brachiopoda, Hemichordata, Platyhelmintes and Bryozoa). Inset: Annual growth of the number of new marine natural products from different marine invertebrate phyla discovered in the 1990s, 2000s and during both decades.
	Figure 2. New natural products from Porifera.Cumulative number of new natural products discovered from the most representative families in phylum Porifera from 1990 to 2009. Inset: Annual growth of the number of new marine natural products discovered from the most representative families in phylum Porifera in the 1990s, 2000s and during both decades.
	Figure 3. New natural products from Cnidaria.Cumulative number of new natural products discovered from the most representative families in phylum Cnidaria from 1990 to 2009. Inset: Annual growth of the number of new marine natural products discovered from the most representative families in phylum Cnidaria in the 1990s, 2000s and during both decades.
	Figure 4. Economic Exclusive Zones.Number of new natural products from marine invertebrates for world Economic Exclusive Zones (EEZ) during the 1990s and the 2000s. Boundaries of Biodiversity Hotspots worldwide are also presented.
	Figure 5. Biodiversity Hotspots.Number of new marine natural products from invertebrates (NMNPI) for Biodiversity Hotspots (BH) worldwide during the 1990s and the 2000s (A – Polynesia-Micronesia, B – Caribbean islands, C – Mediterranean basin, D – Indo-Burma, E – Japan).
	Figure 6. Large Marine Ecosystems.Number of new marine natural products from invertebrates (NMNPI) for world Large Marine Ecosystems (LME) during the 1990s and the 2000s (A – Caribbean Sea, B – South China Sea, C – East China Sea, D – Kuroshio Current).