Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
Proc Biol Sci
2020 May 13;2871926:20200330. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0330.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Small burrowing amphipods cause major damage in a large kelp.
Gutow L
,
Poore AGB
,
Díaz Poblete MA
,
Villalobos V
,
Thiel M
.
Abstract
Large herbivores such as sea urchins and fish consume a high proportion of benthic primary production and frequently control the biomass of marine macrophytes. By contrast, small mesograzers, including gastropods and peracarid crustaceans, are abundant on seaweeds but have low per capita feeding rates and their impacts on marine macrophytes are difficult to predict. To quantify how mesograzers can affect macrophytes, we examined feeding damage by the herbivorous amphipods Sunamphitoe lessoniophila and Bircenna sp., which construct burrows in the stipes of subtidal individuals of the kelp Lessonia berteroana in northern-central Chile, southeast Pacific. Infested stipes showed a characteristic sequence of progressive tissue degeneration. The composition of the amphipod assemblages inside the burrows varied between the different stages of infestation of the burrows. Aggregations of grazers within burrows and microhabitat preference of the amphipods result in localized feeding, leading to stipe breakage and loss of substantial algal biomass. The estimated loss of biomass of single stipes varied between 1 and 77%. For the local kelp population, the amphipods caused an estimated loss of biomass of 24-44%. Consequently, small herbivores can cause considerable damage to large kelp species if their feeding activity is concentrated on structurally valuable algal tissue.
Figure 1. (a) Number of burrows within amphipod domiciles of different infestation stages (see drawings on top of the figure and electronic supplementary material, figure S1) in stipes of L. berteroana from Playa Blanca collected in 2011 and 2014. (b) Number of individuals of S. lessoniophila and Bircenna sp. in domiciles (including single burrows and conglomerates) of different infestation stages in stipes of L. berteroana. Data from the sampling years 2011 and 2014 were combined because the pattern was similar in both years. The dot with a number above it represents an outlier at 117 individuals per domicile, which lies outside the scale of the ordinate.
Figure 2. Composition of assemblages of S. lessoniophila inside individual burrows in stipes of subtidal individuals of L. berteroana (n = 20). Assemblages from conglomerates were not analysed. Numbering of the burrows is done posterior to sample analysis and only for illustrative purposes.
Figure 3. Vertical distribution of amphipod domiciles (n = 312; columns—left ordinate) on the internode levels along stipes (n = 98) of subtidal individuals of L. berteroana from Playa Blanca and vertical percentage distribution of L. berteroana biomass (circles—right ordinate) within the stipes.
Figure 4. (a) Estimated maximal potential loss of biomass (%) in stipes of L. berteroana due to stipe breakages clearly induced by amphipod domiciles and due to all breakages. (b) Observed (triangles) biomass of stipes of L. berteroana from Playa Blanca (including undamaged and damaged stipes) and expected (circles) biomass of undamaged stipes (including undamaged stipes and damaged stipes with the lost biomass being reconstructed). The average (± s.e.m.) biomass was reconstructed for stipes of different size (no. of internode levels) with damage induced by amphipod domiciles (filled circles) and with damage due to all breakages (including breakages due to amphipod domiciles and breakages due to unknown reasons—open circles). n = 40.
Adler,
The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation.
2001, Pubmed
Adler,
The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation.
2001,
Pubmed
Cerda,
Nest-building behavior by the amphipod Peramphithoe femorata (Kroyer) on the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Linnaeus) C. Agardh from Northern-Central Chile.
2010,
Pubmed
Davenport,
Positive indirect effects of reef fishes on kelp performance: the importance of mesograzers.
2007,
Pubmed
Hammons,
Invasive Japanese beetles facilitate aggregation and injury by a native scarab pest of ripening fruits.
2009,
Pubmed
Hay,
Chemical Defense Against Different Marine Herbivores: Are Amphipods Insect Equivalents?
1987,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Martinsen,
Positive interactions between leafrollers and other arthropods enhance biodiversity on hybrid cottonwoods.
2000,
Pubmed
Merilaita,
Different roles of feeding and protection in diel microhabitat choice of sexes in Idotea baltica.
2000,
Pubmed
Pfister,
Climate drivers and animal host use determine kelp performance over decadal scales in the kelp Pleurophycus gardneri (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae).
2018,
Pubmed
Poore,
Global patterns in the impact of marine herbivores on benthic primary producers.
2012,
Pubmed
Poore,
Major consequences of minor damage: impacts of small grazers on fast-growing kelps.
2014,
Pubmed
Poore,
Phylogenetic and geographic variation in host breadth and composition by herbivorous amphipods in the family Ampithoidae.
2008,
Pubmed
Riquelme-Pérez,
Coastal fish assemblages and predation pressure in northern-central Chilean Lessonia trabeculata kelp forests and barren grounds.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Sala,
Community-wide distribution of predator-prey interaction strength in kelp forests.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Taylor,
Tissue-specific induction of herbivore resistance: seaweed response to amphipod grazing.
2002,
Pubmed
