Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Echinobase
ECB-ART-36748
J Exp Biol 1996 Jan 01;199Pt 3:717-29. doi: 10.1242/jeb.199.3.717.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Why the urchin lost its spines: hydrodynamic forces and survivorship in three echinoids

Denny M , Gaylord B .


???displayArticle.abstract???
Two species of sea urchins (Colobocentrotus atratus and Echinometra mathaei) commonly co-occur on wave-swept intertidal shores in the Indo West Pacific. E. mathaei is a typical spiny urchin and is confined to cavities in the rock. In contrast, C. atratus has an unusual morphology, in which the spines are much reduced, and is found on substrata fully exposed to wave-induced velocities and accelerations. Previous researchers have suggested that spine reduction may therefore be a morphological adaptation to hydrodynamic forces. However, measurement of the drag, lift and accelerational forces on sea urchins show that the adaptive significance of spine reduction is less straightforward than it initially appears. The reduction in drag in C. atratus as compared with that in E. mathaei is to a large extent offset by an increase in lift. Instead, the ''streamlined'' morphology of C. atratus seems best adapted to provide a reduction in the force imposed by water acceleration, thereby making it feasible for C. atratus to venture safely into the tumultuous flows of the surf zone.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 9318472
???displayArticle.link??? J Exp Biol


Genes referenced: LOC100887844 LOC115925415 ROCK