|
Figure 1. Percentage of HepG2-cell growth after treatment with selected A. planci fractions at 5 different concentrations, from 3.13 to 50 µg/mL, for 72 h. The percentage of cell growth was compared with that for the negative control of 1% (v/v) of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which was used as the carrier. Data obtained are presented as means ± SDs with n = 6. * denotes significantly different compared with DMSO-treated cells (negative control) at p < 0.05. DMSO was used as the carrier to dissolve and dilute the extract. HepG2 cells were treated with vincristine sulfate (VS) as a positive control.
|
|
Figure 2. The effects of selected A. planci fraction on PCSK9 mRNA expression in HepG2 cells. Each value shows mean ± SEM of 3 replicates after the gene expression level of PCSK9 was normalized against that of β-actin, and the value of the untreated control was assigned as 1. The mRNA expression level of PCSK9 for each treatment is relative to the control value. DMSO was used as the carrier to dissolve and dilute the extract. Cells were treated with 1% (v/v) DMSO and berberine sulfate as the negative and positive controls, respectively. ‘*’ denotes statistically significance (p < 0.05) as compared to untreated control.
|
|
Figure 3. The effects of A. planci on the level of LDLR on the HepG2 cell line at 3 different time points: 12, 24, and 36 h, respectively. Cells were either untreated or treated with 3.13, 6.25, or 12.5 µg/mL of the selected fraction for 12, 24, and 36 h. Images were taken using a high-content screening platform (ImageXpress® Micro, Molecular Devices) (A), and analyzed using ImageJ 1.52a; Java 1.8.0_191 (B). Berberine sulfate (BS)-treated cells were used as the positive control. ‘*’ denotes statistically significance (p < 0.05) as compared to untreated control (DMSO).
|
|
Figure 4. The effects of selected A. planci fraction on the level of LDL-C uptake by the HepG2 cell line at 3 different time points: 12, 24, and 36 h, respectively. Cells were either untreated or treated with 3.13, 6.25, or 12.5 µg/mL of the selected fraction for 12, 24, and 36 h. Images were taken using a high-content screening platform (ImageXpress® Micro, Molecular Devices) (A), and analyzed using ImageJ 1.52a; Java 1.8.0_191 (B). Berberine sulfate (BS)-treated cells were used as the positive control. ‘*’ denotes statistically significance (p < 0.05) as compared to untreated control (DMSO).
|
|
Figure 5. Inhibitory effect of A. planci on PCSK9 promoter fragments. Transient transfection was carried out on 7 different PCSK9 promoter constructs (D1–D7) in the HepG2 cell line, and cells were treated with 6.25 µg/mL of the selected fraction. Luciferase assays were then conducted on cell lysates. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis comparing treated transfected HepG2 cells with the untreated control. * denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05) compared with the untreated control.
|
|
Figure 6. Identification of cis-acting elements involved in the downregulatory effects of the selected A. planci fraction on PCSK9 expression. (A) Schematic representation of the predicted potential transcription binding sites on the 5′-end-deletion constructs of human PCSK9 promoter, as well as the mutated PPRE and SRE used in this study. Position −94 is the 3′ end of PCSK9 promoter inserts common to all promoter–reporter constructs. The 5′ ends of the promoter in each construct are marked by the numbers on the left. MatInspector software was used to predict the transcription binding sites on the PCSK9 promoter (PPRE, peroxisome proliferator response element; SRE, sterol regulatory element; Sp1, specificity protein 1; HNF-1, hepatocyte nuclear factor 1; HINFP, histone nuclear factor P). (B) The core nucleotides for the predicted PPRE and SRE on the PCSK9 promoter are presented in capital letters, and the mutated nucleotides within the binding sites are in capital letters, underlined, and highlighted in bold.
|
|
Figure 7. The effects of mutated PPRE and SRE on PCSK9 promoter activity. The activity of the wild-type promoter construct without treatment with the selected A. planci fraction was assigned as the control level (open bar), and the transcriptional activity of promoter constructs in the cells treated with the selected fraction (closed bar) are represented relative to the control value. The data shown are representative of 3 independent experiments, and each experiment was carried out in triplicate (PPRE, peroxisome proliferator response element; SRE, sterol regulatory element; Sp1, specificity protein 1; HNF-1, hepatocyte nuclear factor 1; HINFP, histone nuclear factor P). * Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05) compared with the untreated control. NS indicates no statistical significance (p > 0.05) between the two compared samples.
|
|
Figure 8. Time-course study on the effects of A. planci on the phosphorylation of MAPK. HepG2 cells were either untreated or treated with 6.25 µg/mL of selected A. planci fraction over a period of 4 h. Isolated cytoplasmic extracts were subjected to Western blot analysis using antibodies against total and phospho-MAPK (A). The levels of protein expression for phospho-MAPK were normalized against those for total MAPK, and the value at each time point represents the fold change of normalized phospho-MAPK protein expression relative to the untreated control, which was assigned a value of 1. * indicates that the value at a particular time point was significantly higher than that of the untreated control (B).
|
|
Figure 9. Time-course study on the effects of A. planci on the phosphorylation of PKCα. HepG2 cells were either untreated or treated with 6.25 µg/mL of selected A. planci fraction over a period of 4 h. Isolated cytoplasmic extracts were subjected to Western blot analysis using antibodies against total and phospho-PKCα (A). The levels of protein expression for phospho-PKCα were normalized against those for total PKCα, and the value at each time point represents the fold change in normalized phospho-PKCα protein expression relative to the untreated control, which is assigned to 1. * Indicates that the value at a particular time point was significantly higher than that of the untreated control (B).
|
|
Figure 10. Effects of pre-treatment with MEK inhibitor (PD98059) (A) and PKCα inhibitor (HA-dihydrochloride) (B) on PCSK9 mRNA level in HepG2 cells treated with A. planci. Assigning the signal for the PCSK9/β-actin ratio in the untreated cells as 1, the expression level of PCSK9 for each dose–response treatment is relative to this control value. Each value shows mean ± SEM of triplicate. * Indicates that the value at a particular time point was significantly higher than that for HepG2 cells treated with the selected A. planci fraction in the absence of inhibitor pre-treatment.
|