Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
PLoS One
2014 Jul 01;97:e101204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101204.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Coral reef community composition in the context of disturbance history on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
Graham NA
,
Chong-Seng KM
,
Huchery C
,
Januchowski-Hartley FA
,
Nash KL
.
Abstract
Much research on coral reefs has documented differential declines in coral and associated organisms. In order to contextualise this general degradation, research on community composition is necessary in the context of varied disturbance histories and the biological processes and physical features thought to retard or promote recovery. We conducted a spatial assessment of coral reef communities across five reefs of the central Great Barrier Reef, Australia, with known disturbance histories, and assessed patterns of coral cover and community composition related to a range of other variables thought to be important for reef dynamics. Two of the reefs had not been extensively disturbed for at least 15 years prior to the surveys. Three of the reefs had been severely impacted by crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks and coral bleaching approximately a decade before the surveys, from which only one of them was showing signs of recovery based on independent surveys. We incorporated wave exposure (sheltered and exposed) and reef zone (slope, crest and flat) into our design, providing a comprehensive assessment of the spatial patterns in community composition on these reefs. Categorising corals into life history groupings, we document major coral community differences in the unrecovered reefs, compared to the composition and covers found on the undisturbed reefs. The recovered reef, despite having similar coral cover, had a different community composition from the undisturbed reefs, which may indicate slow successional processes, or a different natural community dominance pattern due to hydrology and other oceanographic factors. The variables that best correlated with patterns in the coral community among sites included the density of juvenile corals, herbivore fish biomass, fish species richness and the cover of macroalgae. Given increasing impacts to the Great Barrier Reef, efforts to mitigate local stressors will be imperative to encouraging coral communities to persist into the future.
Figure 1. Location of studied reefs and historical patterns of coral cover through time.a) Map of the surveyed reefs. The green dots are the undisturbed reefs, the red dots are the disturbed reefs that did not recover, and the blue dot is the disturbed reef that recovered. b) Coral cover (%) estimates from the 5 reefs from 1995 to 2009 providing the disturbance history context for the spatial data collected in this study. Data for Trunk reef are from Pratchett et al. [40], and for Wheeler, Davies, Rib and John Brewer reefs are from the AIMS Long Term Monitoring Program [41].
Figure 2. Variation in: a) coral cover (%), b) structural complexity, and c) coral genus richness among reefs.Red bars are unrecovered reefs, blue bar is the recovered reef and green bars are undisturbed reefs. Bars represent means per site ±standard error. Horizontal lines represent homogeneous subsets from post hoc comparisons using the Tukey test.
Figure 3. Influence of zone and exposure on coral cover, richness and structural complexity among disturbance groupings.Variation in: a) coral cover (%), b) structural complexity, and c) coral genus richness among disturbance category, reef zones and wave exposure levels. Bars represent means per site ± standard error.
Figure 4. Differences in coral community composition by life history strategy with disturbance, zone and exposure.a) Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis of coral group cover (%) based on life history categorisation. Colour and shape of symbols represent disturbance category, reef zone and wave exposure. Vectors represent the relative contribution of the coral groups to the observed variation among sites. b) Competitive coral cover (%) among disturbance category, reef zone and wave exposure. c) Non-competitive (weedy, stress-tolerant, generalist and other) coral cover (%) among disturbance category, reef zone and wave exposure. Bars represent means per site ± standard error.
Ayre,
Genotypic diversity and gene flow in brooding and spawning corals along the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
2000, Pubmed
Ayre,
Genotypic diversity and gene flow in brooding and spawning corals along the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
2000,
Pubmed
Bellwood,
Confronting the coral reef crisis.
2004,
Pubmed
Bruno,
Regional decline of coral cover in the Indo-Pacific: timing, extent, and subregional comparisons.
2007,
Pubmed
Burkepile,
Herbivore vs. nutrient control of marine primary producers: context-dependent effects.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Cheal,
Spatial variation in the functional characteristics of herbivorous fish communities and the resilience of coral reefs.
2013,
Pubmed
Darling,
Life histories predict coral community disassembly under multiple stressors.
2013,
Pubmed
Darling,
Evaluating life-history strategies of reef corals from species traits.
2012,
Pubmed
De'ath,
The 27-year decline of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef and its causes.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Fabricius,
Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs: review and synthesis.
2005,
Pubmed
Gardner,
Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals.
2003,
Pubmed
Gilmour,
Recovery of an isolated coral reef system following severe disturbance.
2013,
Pubmed
Graham,
Dynamic fragility of oceanic coral reef ecosystems.
2006,
Pubmed
Hughes,
Assembly rules of reef corals are flexible along a steep climatic gradient.
2012,
Pubmed
Hughes,
Rising to the challenge of sustaining coral reef resilience.
2010,
Pubmed
Madin,
Ecological consequences of major hydrodynamic disturbances on coral reefs.
2006,
Pubmed
McClanahan,
Critical thresholds and tangible targets for ecosystem-based management of coral reef fisheries.
2011,
Pubmed
McCook,
Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: a globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
McCulloch,
Coral record of increased sediment flux to the inner Great Barrier Reef since European settlement.
2003,
Pubmed
Mora,
Global human footprint on the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in reef fishes.
2011,
Pubmed
Mumby,
Trophic cascade facilitates coral recruitment in a marine reserve.
2007,
Pubmed
Olsson,
Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
2008,
Pubmed
Osborne,
Disturbance and the dynamics of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef (1995-2009).
2011,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Pandolfi,
Projecting coral reef futures under global warming and ocean acidification.
2011,
Pubmed
Pratchett,
Selective coral mortality associated with outbreaks of Acanthaster planci L. in Bootless Bay, Papua New Guinea.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Sheppard,
Erosion vs. recovery of coral reefs after 1998 El Niño: Chagos reefs, Indian Ocean.
2002,
Pubmed
Stoeckl,
The economic value of ecosystem services in the Great Barrier Reef: our state of knowledge.
2011,
Pubmed
Sweatman,
No-take reserves protect coral reefs from predatory starfish.
2008,
Pubmed
Trapon,
Spatial variation in abundance, size and orientation of juvenile corals related to the biomass of parrotfishes on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
2013,
Pubmed
Williams,
Benthic communities at two remote Pacific coral reefs: effects of reef habitat, depth, and wave energy gradients on spatial patterns.
2013,
Pubmed
Wilson,
Effect of macroalgal expansion and marine protected areas on coral recovery following a climatic disturbance.
2012,
Pubmed
