Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
BMC Genomics
2014 Nov 28;15:1035. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1035.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
High opsin diversity in a non-visual infaunal brittle star.
Delroisse J
,
Ullrich-Lüter E
,
Ortega-Martinez O
,
Dupont S
,
Arnone MI
,
Mallefet J
,
Flammang P
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
BACKGROUND: In metazoans, opsins are photosensitive proteins involved in both vision and non-visual photoreception. Echinoderms have no well-defined eyes but several opsin genes were found in the purple sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) genome. Molecular data are lacking for other echinoderm classes although many species are known to be light sensitive.
RESULTS: In this study focused on the European brittle star Amphiura filiformis, we first highlighted a blue-green light sensitivity using a behavioural approach. We then identified 13 new putative opsin genes against eight bona fide opsin genes in the genome of S. purpuratus. Six opsins were included in the rhabdomeric opsin group (r-opsins). In addition, one putative ciliary opsin (c-opsin), showing high similarity with the c-opsin of S. purpuratus (Sp-opsin 1), one Go opsin similar to Sp-opsins 3.1 and 3.2, two basal-branch opsins similar to Sp-opsins 2 and 5, and two neuropsins similar to Sp-opsin 8, were identified. Finally, two sequences from one putative RGR opsin similar to Sp-opsin 7 were also detected. Adult arm transcriptome analysis pinpointed opsin mRNAs corresponding to one r-opsin, one neuropsin and the homologue of Sp-opsin 2. Opsin phylogeny was determined by maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses. Using antibodies designed against c- and r-opsins from S. purpuratus, we detected putative photoreceptor cells mainly in spines and tube feet of A. filiformis, respectively. The r-opsin expression pattern is similar to the one reported in S. purpuratus with cells labelled at the tip and at the base of the tube feet. In addition, r-opsin positive cells were also identified in the radial nerve of the arm. C-opsins positive cells, expressed in pedicellariae, spines, tube feet and epidermis in S. purpuratus were observed at the level of the spine stroma in the brittle star.
CONCLUSION: Light perception in A. filiformis seems to be mediated by opsins (c- and r-) in, at least, spines, tube feet and in the radial nerve cord. Other non-visual opsin types could participate to the light perception process indicating a complex expression pattern of opsins in this infaunal brittle star.
Figure 1.
Outline of the search pipeline used to identify putative opsin sequences in our datasets (see
Methods
for details). For reference sequences, see Additional file 2.
Figure 2.
Amino acid similarity (%) between Af-opsins and Sp-opsins (+ Rn Rhodopsin). Similarity measurements were conducted between each Af-opsin and all reference opsins (Sp, Rn) on the basis of a local alignment. Trimming was performed on the local alignment. Each similarity estimation is depending on the length of the local alignment. Values framed in red indicate best similarities.
Figure 3.
Scatter-plots comparing the number of arms observed out of the sediment during the day (specific colour treatments) and the night (means ± S.E.M.). Different treatment conditions (white daylight, no daylight, red/green/blue daylights) are represented in each graph. */**Significant difference between day and night for a particular treatment, nsNo significant difference.
Figure 4.
Deduced amino acid sequences of Amphiura filiformis opsins (names in bold in the figure) aligned with Strongylocentrotus purpuratus opsins and Rattus norvegicus rhodopsin. Alignment is limited to two highly conserved regions including the “DRY-type” tripeptide, the opsin-specific lysine residue, and the “NPxxY(x)6F” pattern. Predicted transmembrane alpha-helices are underlined in red. The lysine residue involved in the Schiff base formation – equivalent to K296 of the R. norvegicus rhodopsin - is highlighted in red in the alignment. The tyrosine residue (Y) in the position equivalent to the glutamate counterion E113 in R. norvegicus rhodopsin, and the DRY-type tripeptide motif (E134/R135/Y136 in R. norvegicus rhodopsin) is highlighted in blue. The pattern “NPxxY(x)6F” (position 302–313 of the R. norvegicus rhodopsin sequence) is highlighted in green. The amino acid triad (in the equivalent position 310–312 in the R. norvegicus rhodopsin) belong to the pattern NPxxY(x)6F. The “NxQ” motif, classically observed in c-opsins is written in red in the alignment and the “HxK” motif, classically observed in r-opsins, in blue. Other amino-acid residues that are highly conserved in the whole opsin family are shown with a grey background. See text and Additional file 3 for more details. Numbers indicated in gray on the left side of each aligned region correspond to the position number of the first amino acid of the considered sequence.
Figure 5.
Phylogenetic tree of metazoan opsins including the new opsins from Amphiura filiformis. Representative bilaterian opsin members cluster into six significantly supported groups in both maximum likelihood and Bayesian analysis. Branch support values are indicated next to the branching points and correspond to posterior probabilities and boostrap proportions (in italics). Branch length scale bar indicate relative amount of amino acid changes (Bayesian analysis). A. filiformis opsins are represented in bold (Af). Other echinoderm opsins were included in the analyses: Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Sp), Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (Sd), Paracentrotus lividus (Pl), Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus (Hp), Asterias rubens (Ar).
Figure 6.
Ciliary opsin positive cells in decalcified arms of Amphiura filiformis, detected by Confocal laser scanning microscopy. Double immunolocalisation of c-opsin (red) and acetylated alpha-tubulin (green). A. Partially inverted transmission picture of an arm showing c-opsin positive cells/photoreceptor cells (cop + PRC) in the spines (sp). B. c-opsin proteins seem to be localised in the inner portion of the spines. C. Dense nerve tracts are present at the basis of the spines. D. Nerve tracts partially also run through an internal portion of the spines. Tube feet (tf) show no c-opsin positive cells. E. High magnification reveals connection of the c-opsin positive cells to the nerve tracts (ntr). F. Transmission view of a spine showing the internal c-opsin positive cells and the dark pigment (pig) at the spine base. Scale bars in A-D: 100 μm, E: 20 μm, F: 50 μm.
Figure 7.
Rhabdomeric opsin positive cells in decalcified arms of Amphiura filiformis, detected by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Double immunolocalisation of r-opsin (red) and acetylated alpha-tubulin (green). A. Transmission view of arm (arm) with tube feet (tf) and spines (sp). B. R-opsin positive cells reside in tube feet and radial nerve. C. Innervation of arm showing connection of the radial nerve (radn) to each tube foot nerve ring (tfnr) and spine nerve (spn). D. Tube feet show r-opsin protein (rop+) presence within middle and tip region. R-opsins are also detected within radial nerves. R-opsin positive structures within the radial nerve likely represent axonal/dendritic projections and no stained cell bodies were observed. Scale bars in A-D: 200 μm.
Figure 8.
Rhabdomeric opsin positive cells in the tube feet of Amphiura filiformis, detected by CLSM. Double immunolocalisation of r-opsin (red/hot red) and acetylated alpha-tubulin (green). A. Transmission view of a tube foot (tf) with tip r-opsin positive cells (trop+). B. R-opsin staining shows a cone shaped morphology. C. Cilia (ci) are present along the longitudinal axis of the tube foot. D. Dark areas within the r-opsin positive region indicate location of nuclei. Cilia protrude from the r-opsin positive cells. E. Tube foot proximal r-opsin positive cells (brop+) showing a striated pattern. F. Dense nerve tracts (ntr) but also fine nerve fibers connect to the tube foot nerve ring (tfnr) in the area of proximal r-opsin positive cells. Scale bars in A-D: 10 μm, E-F: 50 μm.
Agca,
Neurosensory and neuromuscular organization in tube feet of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.
2011, Pubmed,
Echinobase
Agca,
Neurosensory and neuromuscular organization in tube feet of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Aizenberg,
Calcitic microlenses as part of the photoreceptor system in brittlestars.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Altschul,
Basic local alignment search tool.
1990,
Pubmed
Arendt,
Ciliary photoreceptors with a vertebrate-type opsin in an invertebrate brain.
2004,
Pubmed
Arendt,
The 'division of labour' model of eye evolution.
2009,
Pubmed
Bellingham,
Evolution of melanopsin photoreceptors: discovery and characterization of a new melanopsin in nonmammalian vertebrates.
2006,
Pubmed
Bockaert,
Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success.
1999,
Pubmed
Brandenburger,
Fine structure of eyespots in tornarian larvae (phylum: Hemichordata).
1973,
Pubmed
Burge,
Finding the genes in genomic DNA.
1998,
Pubmed
Burke,
A genomic view of the sea urchin nervous system.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Cobb,
Comparative studies on receptor structure in the brittlestar Ophiura ophiura.
1986,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Cobb,
The giant neurone system in Ophiuroids. I. The general morphology of the radial nerve cords and circumoral nerve ring.
1981,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Czarkwiani,
Expression of skeletogenic genes during arm regeneration in the brittle star Amphiura filiformis.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Delroisse,
High opsin diversity in a non-visual infaunal brittle star.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Delroisse,
High opsin diversity in a non-visual infaunal brittle star.
2014,
Pubmed
Edgar,
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.
2004,
Pubmed
Fain,
Phototransduction and the evolution of photoreceptors.
2010,
Pubmed
Feuda,
Metazoan opsin evolution reveals a simple route to animal vision.
2012,
Pubmed
Feuda,
The comb jelly opsins and the origins of animal phototransduction.
2014,
Pubmed
Frank,
Light and vision in the deep-sea benthos: II. Vision in deep-sea crustaceans.
2012,
Pubmed
Fritze,
Role of the conserved NPxxY(x)5,6F motif in the rhodopsin ground state and during activation.
2003,
Pubmed
Fu,
Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells detect light with a vitamin A-based photopigment, melanopsin.
2005,
Pubmed
Garm,
Visual navigation in starfish: first evidence for the use of vision and eyes in starfish.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Gouy,
SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building.
2010,
Pubmed
Guindon,
A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood.
2003,
Pubmed
Guindon,
Estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyML.
2009,
Pubmed
Hatori,
Inducible ablation of melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells reveals their central role in non-image forming visual responses.
2008,
Pubmed
Hattar,
Melanopsin and rod-cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in mice.
2003,
Pubmed
Hattar,
Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells: architecture, projections, and intrinsic photosensitivity.
2002,
Pubmed
Holland,
The amphioxus genome illuminates vertebrate origins and cephalochordate biology.
2008,
Pubmed
Johnsen,
Identification and localization of a possible rhodopsin in the echinoderms Asterias forbesi (Asteroidea) and Ophioderma brevispinum (Ophiuroidea).
1997,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Jones,
A model recognition approach to the prediction of all-helical membrane protein structure and topology.
1994,
Pubmed
Kartelija,
Photosensitive neurons in mollusks.
2003,
Pubmed
Kojima,
UV-sensitive photoreceptor protein OPN5 in humans and mice.
2011,
Pubmed
Koyanagi,
Gq-coupled rhodopsin subfamily composed of invertebrate visual pigment and melanopsin.
2008,
Pubmed
Kozmik,
Assembly of the cnidarian camera-type eye from vertebrate-like components.
2008,
Pubmed
Kumar,
MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences.
2008,
Pubmed
Kumbalasiri,
Melanopsin and other novel mammalian opsins.
2005,
Pubmed
Kusakabe,
Photoreceptive systems in ascidians.
2007,
Pubmed
Land,
The evolution of eyes.
1992,
Pubmed
Lesser,
Sea urchin tube feet are photosensory organs that express a rhabdomeric-like opsin and PAX6.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Morris,
Development of the five primary podia from the coeloms of a sea star larva: homology with the echinoid echinoderms and other deuterostomes.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Nasi,
Melanopsin-mediated light-sensing in amphioxus: a glimpse of the microvillar photoreceptor lineage within the deuterostomia.
2009,
Pubmed
Nilsson,
The evolution of eyes and visually guided behaviour.
2009,
Pubmed
Nilsson,
Eye evolution: a question of genetic promiscuity.
2004,
Pubmed
Ooka,
Spatiotemporal expression pattern of an encephalopsin orthologue of the sea urchin Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus during early development, and its potential role in larval vertical migration.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Palczewski,
Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor.
2000,
Pubmed
Panda,
Melanopsin is required for non-image-forming photic responses in blind mice.
2003,
Pubmed
Pearson,
Comparison of DNA sequences with protein sequences.
1997,
Pubmed
Plachetzki,
New insights into the evolutionary history of photoreceptor cells.
2005,
Pubmed
Porter,
Shedding new light on opsin evolution.
2012,
Pubmed
Provencio,
A novel human opsin in the inner retina.
2000,
Pubmed
Raible,
Opsins and clusters of sensory G-protein-coupled receptors in the sea urchin genome.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Rollag,
Melanopsin, ganglion-cell photoreceptors, and mammalian photoentrainment.
2003,
Pubmed
Ronquist,
MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.
2012,
Pubmed
Ruby,
Role of melanopsin in circadian responses to light.
2002,
Pubmed
Schnitzler,
Genomic organization, evolution, and expression of photoprotein and opsin genes in Mnemiopsis leidyi: a new view of ctenophore photocytes.
2012,
Pubmed
Shichida,
Evolution of opsins and phototransduction.
2009,
Pubmed
Smith,
The phylogeny of echinoderm classes based on mitochondrial gene arrangements.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Sodergren,
The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
TAKAHASHI,
ELECTRICAL RESPONSES TO LIGHT STIMULI IN THE ISOLATED RADIAL NERVE OF THE SEA URCHIN, DIADEMA SETOSUM (LESKE).
1964,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Tamura,
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0.
2007,
Pubmed
Tarttelin,
Neuropsin (Opn5): a novel opsin identified in mammalian neural tissue.
2003,
Pubmed
Telford,
Phylogenomic analysis of echinoderm class relationships supports Asterozoa.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Terakita,
Counterion displacement in the molecular evolution of the rhodopsin family.
2004,
Pubmed
Tong,
Evidence for light perception in a bioluminescent organ.
2009,
Pubmed
Ullrich-Lüter,
Unique system of photoreceptors in sea urchin tube feet.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Ullrich-Lüter,
C-opsin expressing photoreceptors in echinoderms.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Whelan,
A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach.
2001,
Pubmed
Wilkins,
Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server.
1999,
Pubmed
Wolken,
Photobehavior of marine invertebrates: extraocular photoreception.
1988,
Pubmed
Yamashita,
Opn5 is a UV-sensitive bistable pigment that couples with Gi subtype of G protein.
2010,
Pubmed
Yerramilli,
Spatial vision in the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Echinoidea).
2010,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Yoshida,
Compound ocellus of a starfish: its function.
1966,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase